Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 30, 2026

Curation of Computational Chemical Libraries Demonstrated with Alpha-Amino Acids
Published on: April 13, 2022
Five dominant amino acid substitution signatures shape tumour immunity
Szilvia Juhász1,2, Benjamin Tamás Papp3,4,5, Anna Tácia Fülöp3,4,6,7
1Synthetic and Systems Biology Unit, Institute of Biochemistry, HUN-REN Biological Research Centre, Szeged, Hungary. juhasz.szilvia@brc.hu.
Abstract:
Although numerous mutational processes operate in cancer, their functional impacts are unclear. We hypothesised that certain mutation sources preferentially generate amino acid substitutions that evade immune recognition, producing immune-cold tumours regardless of tissue or mutation load. By analysing 9300 cancer exomes and performing mutagenesis experiments, we mapped links between mutagens, DNA-repair defects, and amino acid substitution signatures (AAS). Surprisingly, the spectrum collapsed into five recurrent AAS with distinct functional profiles. AAS4-generated by alkylating agents and mismatch-repair (MMR) deficiency and enriched in kidney and liver cancers-is less likely to accumulate hydrophobic residues, yielding poorly immunogenic neopeptides. These tumours display immune-desert microenvironments and respond poorly to immunotherapy. However, certain human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I variants, such as HLA-B*07:02, correlate with immune-hot tumours in this subgroup. HLA-B*07:02, common in Europeans, presents proline-enriched neopeptides derived from AAS4 mutations. Supporting this, B*07:02-positive cancer cells harbouring AAS4-type mutations stimulated T-cell proliferation in vitro. These results show that neoantigen quality, not merely quantity, dictates anti-tumour immunity, explain inconsistent immunotherapy responses in MMR-deficient cancers, and advocate incorporating amino acid substitution patterns into predictive biomarkers and therapy design.
Insights
Cancer mutations impact immune evasion. Specific mutation sources create amino acid substitutions (AAS) that lead to immune-cold tumors, affecting immunotherapy response. Neoantigen quality, not just quantity, drives anti-tumor immunity.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Immunology
- Genetics
Background:
- Numerous mutational processes occur in cancer, but their functional impacts, particularly on immune recognition, remain unclear.
- The hypothesis is that specific mutation sources generate amino acid substitutions (AAS) that evade immune detection, leading to immune-cold tumors irrespective of tissue type or mutation burden.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the functional impacts of various mutational processes in cancer.
- To map the links between mutagens, DNA-repair defects, and distinct amino acid substitution signatures (AAS).
- To understand how neoantigen quality influences anti-tumor immunity and immunotherapy response.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 9300 cancer exomes.
- In silico prediction and experimental mutagenesis studies.
- Correlation analysis between specific AAS, tumor microenvironments, and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) class I variants.
Main Results:
- The mutational spectrum collapsed into five recurrent AAS with distinct functional profiles.
- AAS4, associated with alkylating agents and mismatch-repair (MMR) deficiency, yields poorly immunogenic neopeptides, resulting in immune-desert tumors with poor immunotherapy response.
- Certain HLA class I variants, like HLA-B*07:02, correlate with immune-hot tumors in the AAS4 subgroup by presenting proline-enriched neopeptides, stimulating T-cell proliferation.
Conclusions:
- Neoantigen quality, not solely quantity, is critical for anti-tumor immunity.
- The findings explain variable immunotherapy responses in MMR-deficient cancers.
- Amino acid substitution patterns should be incorporated into predictive biomarkers and cancer therapy design.
Related Concept Videos
Amino acids
Amino Acid Catabolism
Amino Acid Biosynthetic Pathways
Incomplete Dominance
Phase II Reactions: Sulfation and Conjugation with α-Amino Acids
Nucleophilic Acyl Substitution of Carboxylic Acid Derivatives

