Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Flexible Colonoscopy in Mice to Evaluate the Severity of Colitis and Colorectal Tumors Using a Validated Endoscopic Scoring System
Published on: October 16, 2013
Low-volume bowel preparation provides safe and effective pan-enteric capsule endoscopy in suspected or established
Snir Livne1, Nathaniel Aviv Cohen1,2, Naomi Fliss-Isakov2,3
1School of Medicine, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.
Background:
Effective pan-enteric capsule endoscopy (PCE) visualization requires thorough bowel preparation. We hypothesized that a novel low-volume protocol (LVP) provides comparable safety and effectiveness to the standard high-volume protocol (HVP).
Aim:
To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel low-volume vs standard high-volume preparation protocol for PCE.
Methods:
We conducted an observational study including all prospectively documented PCEs at our tertiary center (2018-2021), comparing preparation adequacy and completion rates between patients receiving LVP vs HVP. Preparation adequacy was evaluated by two blinded expert readers (Cohen's kappa, correlation tests). Finally, an individual participant data meta-analysis combining our cohort with three published cohorts assessed PCE outcomes with HVP vs LVP. A P value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests.
Results:
Our analysis included 67 patients: 12 (17.9%) underwent PCE with HVP, and 55 (82.1%) with LVP. No post-PCE complications were reported. PCE completion was achieved by 89.1% of the LVP group and 75.0% of the HVP group. Adequate small bowel and colonic preparation rates were comparable between the HVP and LVP groups (90.9% vs 89.1%, and 80.0% vs 90.0%, respectively). In our individual patient data meta-analysis, the combined HVP (n = 257) and the LVP (n = 55) were comparable regarding completion rates (87.2% vs 89.1%) and adequate small bowel preparation rates (90.0% vs 89.1%); however, LVP had higher rates of adequate colonic preparation vs combined HVP (80.0% vs 62.7%, respectively, P = 0.017).
Conclusion:
LVP is a safe and effective alternative to HVP with similar completion rates, better colonic preparation, and lower volume, making it preferable for patients with suspected or diagnosed Crohn's disease.
More Related Videos
06:28E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
03:43Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Lower GI Series: Barium Enema
Procedure Details
The examination begins by inserting a lubricated rectal tube into the patient's rectum to administer a radiopaque barium solution. The barium flow is carefully...