Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

High-Throughput Dissociation and Orthotopic Implantation of Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: December 20, 2024
Patient Perspectives on AI-Powered Medical Robots in Breast and Prostate Cancer Care: Qualitative Study
Mahiya Habib1, Janet Ellis2,3, Aaron Palachi1,4
1Department of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Patients with breast and prostate cancer show cautious acceptance of artificial intelligence (AI) in cancer care. They prioritize AI as a tool to support, not replace, human providers, emphasizing education and transparent communication for successful integration.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Medical Informatics
- Health Services Research
Background:
- Cancer is a significant health concern in Canada, with breast and prostate cancers being highly prevalent.
- Artificial intelligence (AI) offers potential advancements in cancer care accuracy, efficiency, and timeliness.
- Patient perspectives on AI integration in cancer care, particularly acceptability, are largely unexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore patient perceptions and acceptability of AI-powered robots in breast and prostate cancer care.
- To identify barriers and facilitators for implementing AI in cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment.
Main Methods:
- Qualitative study involving semistructured interviews with 15 breast and prostate cancer patients.
- Interviews conducted via telephone or Zoom, with data analyzed using conventional content analysis.
- Two-stage interview process to explore initial reactions and practical implementation considerations.
Main Results:
- Patients expressed openness to AI but stressed the importance of reduced wait times, safety, reliability, and patient-centeredness.
- Willingness to accept AI-assisted care increased with education and transparent communication regarding its accuracy and efficiency.
- Key barriers included concerns about reliability and loss of human interaction; facilitators were timely results, efficiency, and AI complementing human expertise.
Conclusions:
- Patients are cautiously willing to accept AI in cancer care when it complements, not replaces, human providers.
- Maintaining healthcare provider presence, providing clear education, and ensuring transparent communication are crucial for AI acceptance.
- Personalized education and diverse information delivery methods can enhance patient confidence and acceptability of AI in cancer care pathways.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Patient-centered Care
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Psychodynamic Perspectives on Personality
Psychodynamic theorists argue that unconscious...
Varicose Veins II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care
Pulmonary Embolism II: Diagnostic Studies and Interprofessional Care

