Symptom burden and secondary prevention in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial
Eleonora Hamilton1, Tomas Jernberg2, Joakim Alfredsson3
1Department of Clinical Sciences, Karolinska Institutet Institutionen för kliniska vetenskaper Danderyds sjukhus, Stockholm, Sweden eleonora.hamilton@ki.se.
Insights
Patients with reduced ejection fraction (EF) after myocardial infarction (MI) experience more symptoms and poorer secondary prevention. This highlights a critical need for improved post-MI care for heart failure patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Public Health
- Clinical Research
Background:
- Lack of current data on left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction post myocardial infarction (MI).
- Focus on symptom burden and secondary prevention measures in these patients.
- Need for contemporary data on LV dysfunction post-MI.
Purpose of the Study:
- Describe patients with varying degrees of LV systolic dysfunction after a first MI.
- Assess symptom burden, quality of life, and adherence to secondary prevention.
- Utilize nationwide patient data for comprehensive analysis.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of 49,564 patients from the Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease registry (2011-2018).
- Inclusion criteria: first acute MI, discharged alive, no prior heart failure.
- Stratification based on the degree of LV systolic dysfunction.
Main Results:
- Patients with EF <30% reported significantly more shortness of breath (32.3% vs 5.6%) and higher readmission rates (48.1% vs 31.2%) compared to normal EF.
- Reduced EF patients were more often on sick leave (26.6% vs 9.5%).
- No significant differences in chest pain or quality of life were observed; lower participation in education and physical therapy noted for EF <30%.
Conclusions:
- LV systolic dysfunction post-MI is linked to substantial symptom burden.
- Worse secondary prevention adherence observed in patients with reduced EF.
- Contemporary data underscore the need for enhanced post-MI care strategies.
Background:
There is a lack of contemporary data describing patients with left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction post myocardial infarction (MI) in terms of symptom burden and secondary prevention measures. The aim of this study was to describe patients with various degrees of LV systolic dysfunction after a first MI, their symptom burden, quality of life and adherence to recommended secondary prevention measures in a nationwide patient material.
Methods:
Patients (n=49 564) registered in the Swedish Web-System for Enhancement and Development of Evidence-Based Care in Heart Disease registry between 2011 and 2018, diagnosed with a first acute MI, discharged alive and with no previous heart failure, were stratified by degree of LV systolic dysfunction.
Results:
Compared with patients with normal ejection fraction (EF≥50%), patients with a reduced EF (<30%) more often experienced shortness of breath (32.3% vs 5.6%, adjusted OR (95% CI): 7.45 (6.22 to 8.92)), had more often been readmitted (48.1% vs 31.2%, 1.87 (1.61 to 2.19)) and were more often on sick leave (26.6% vs 9.5%, 3.35 (2.45 to 4.58)), whereas there were no significant differences regarding chest pain and quality of life at the follow-up visit after 11-13 months. Patients with EF <30% had participated in education programme (44.9% vs 55.5%, 0.70 (0.60 to 0.81)) and physical therapy (11.3% vs 14.9%, 0.68 (0.58 to 0.79)) and have been physically active at least 30 min per day for at least 5 days per week (35.5% vs 40.2%, 0.86 (0.73 to 1.01)) to a lesser extent.
Conclusion:
Contemporary representative data show that LV systolic dysfunction after MI is associated with a very high symptom burden and worse secondary prevention after 11-13 months.
Related Concept Videos
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Secondary Active Transport
Secondary Healthcare System
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Primary and Secondary Growth in Roots and Shoots
Cancer Prevention
Some...


