How effective is rejoining a long-term weight loss program? The 5- and 10-year MRI-assessed Follow Interventions
Hadar Klein1, Dafna Pachter1, Dana Tamar Goldberg Toren1
1Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Community Health Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Public Health, The Health and Nutrition Innovative International Research Center, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, P.O. Box 653, Beer-Sheva, 8410501, Israel.
Background:
It remains unclear whether reengaging in lifestyle weight loss interventions is effective for the long-term.
Methods:
We conducted the CENTRAL (trial 1, T1) lifestyle weight-loss trial in 2012-2014, and the DIRECT-PLUS (trial 2, T2) weight-loss trial in 2017-2018. All participants were invited for follow-up in 2022-2024 to assess weight, metabolic biomarkers, and fat depots via magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI) five years after the second trial.
Results:
The analysis included 572 trial observations contributed by 480 participants; of these, 388 participated in one of the two trials and 92 participated in both (T1 + T2 rejoiners). At follow-up, 384/480 (80%) were re-evaluated, including 76/92 (83%) rejoiners. In T1, participants who participated once and those who later rejoined T2 exhibited similar responses to their first intervention, including comparable weight-loss (-3.3% vs. -3.4%; FDR = 0.93). However, T1 + T2 rejoiners began their second intervention with a similar baseline BMI to their first (31.8 kg/m2 vs. 31.3 kg/m2; FDR = 0.12). Nevertheless, they presented a more favourable abdominal fat and metabolic profiles at T2 baseline than at their initial T1 baseline (visceral adipose tissue (VAT): 135.5 cm2 vs. 160.0 cm2; homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR): 3.8 vs. 4.5; high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)/Triglycerides: 3.6 vs. 4.2; all FDR < 0.05). In response to T2, rejoiners exhibited attenuated improvements compared to those achieved during their previous T1 intervention (weight: -1.5% vs. -3.5%; VAT: -7.2% vs. -33.3%; deep subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT): -4.0% vs. -31.9%; superficial SAT: -3.3% vs. -25.4%; all FDR < 0.05), and compared to first-time T2 participants (weight: -3.5%; FDR < 0.05, VAT: -11.6%; FDR = 0.20, deep SAT: -9.9%; FDR < 0.05, superficial SAT: -9.3%; FDR = 0.05). Yet, 5 years after completing T2, T1 + T2 rejoiners exhibited significantly less weight regain compared with first-time T2 participants (+ 0.2% vs. + 2.9%; FDR < 0.05), deep-SAT regain (+ 2.4% vs. + 13.3%; FDR < 0.05), and superficial-SAT regain (+ 12.8% vs. + 24.3%; FDR < 0.05), though similar VAT regain. Overall, although T1 + T2 rejoiners had higher baseline obesity parameters than first-time participants, they presented comparable values by the 5- and 10-year follow-up.
Conclusions:
Despite an attenuated weight-loss response, repeated engagement in a structured lifestyle intervention yields meaningful long-term impacts with sustainable metabolic benefits.
Trial Registration:
CENTRAL (Clinical-trials-identifier:NCT01530724); DIRECT-PLUS (Clinical-trials-identifier:NCT03020186).
More Related Videos
11:29Real-time Video Projection in an MRI for Characterization of Neural Correlates Associated with Mirror Therapy for Phantom Limb Pain
Published on: April 20, 2019
15:00Daily Transfers, Archiving Populations, and Measuring Fitness in the Long-Term Evolution Experiment with Escherichia coli
Published on: August 18, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Induced-fit Model
Enzymes exhibit substrate specificity, meaning that they can only bind to certain substrates. This is mainly determined by the shape and chemical...
Fischer Projections
Inclusive Fitness
Framing Effects
Goodness-of-Fit Test
Line Loss
Line loss impacts power delivery efficiency in a balanced three-phase circuit. The symmetry in such a circuit simplifies the...
