Moving against inertia, friction and gravity: different modalities, same consequences for animal propulsive force
M Vonderscher1, B Morel1,2, P Rozier-Delgado1,2
1Laboratoire Interuniversitaire de Biologie de la Motricité LIBM, EA 7424, Université Savoie Mont-Blanc, F-73000, Chambéry, France.
None:
The ability to generate propulsive force at different velocities is essential for animal locomotion but has often been overlooked. This study explored animal locomotion under varying mechanical constraints by addressing whether force capacity measured during acceleration on level ground is representative of propulsion capacity exerted during steady velocity uphill running or running against a resistance. We hypothesised that locomotion against resistance induced by inertia, friction or gravity would lead to similar propulsive force capacity, step length and step frequency. Nineteen human participants performed three accelerated, six resisted and ten uphill sprints while their instantaneous velocity, step length and step frequency were measured. The propulsive force capacity decreased linearly with velocity. This individual relationship was preserved among the disparate mechanical constraints, with humans just shifting along this curve. Trivial (-2.0±21.7%, P=0.43) and small differences (-6.1±21.5%, P=0.24), and positive correlation (P<0.001) were indeed found between force capacities at similar velocities among uphill/accelerated (r=0.94) and resisted/accelerated (r=0.91) conditions, respectively. Spatio-temporal variables did not differ between conditions (<2%). Conducting similar analysis in a 12-animal dataset from the literature revealed that different experimental modalities are associated with similar propulsive force-velocity relationships within the same species. Extending the analogy between accelerated, uphill and resisted running to the animal kingdom enabled comparisons between species based on propulsive force capacity and allometric scaling. Using humans as an experimental paradigm, we provide a framework for interpreting how environmental stressors affect movement strategy in many terrestrial species. In the field of sports science, this study has practical implications for the design of training and research protocols.
More Related Videos
07:03Author Spotlight: Bridging the Gap Between In Vivo and Ex Vivo Studies with the "Avatar" Technique to Advance Muscle Mechanics Research
Published on: August 18, 2023
07:44Construction of Constant-Load (Isotonic) and Constant-Velocity (Isokinetic) Torque-Velocity-Power Profiles In vivo for the Rat Plantar Flexors
Published on: October 3, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Force
The study of motion is called kinematics, but kinematics only...
Frictional Force
Static and Kinetic Frictional Force
However, if two systems are in contact and are stationary relative to one...
Non-conservative Forces
Also unlike their conservative counterparts, they are path-dependent; where the object starts and stops does matter. For example, a grinding wheel applies a...
Introduction to force
Characteristics of Dry Friction
Before the wheelbarrow starts moving, the static frictional force acts tangentially to the contact surface, opposing the force that is about to induce the motion. This frictional force prevents the...
