Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Investigating the Pathogenesis of MYH7 Mutation Gly823Glu in Familial Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy using a Mouse Model
Published on: August 8, 2022
Assessment of HeartModel® automated left ventricular ejection fraction for patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
John Morrissey1, Libin Wang2, Monica Dehn2
1Department of Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Insights
Machine learning-based left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) assessments in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients differ significantly from standard methods. This raises concerns for using automated LVEF software in guiding cardiac myosin inhibitor treatments.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Artificial Intelligence
Background:
- Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs) offer new treatment options for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM).
- CMIs carry a risk of systolic dysfunction, necessitating accurate monitoring of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
- Machine learning (ML) algorithms show potential for frequent and accurate LVEF assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of a commercial ML-based LVEF model in patients with obstructive HCM.
- To compare automated LVEF measurements with standard echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI).
Main Methods:
- A single-center prospective study included 50 patients with HCM.
- Left ventricular function was assessed using Philips HeartModel® (automated), echocardiographer assessment (standard), and cMRI.
- Measurements included LVEF, end-diastolic volume (EDV), and end-systolic volume (ESV).
Main Results:
- Automated LVEF was significantly lower than standard assessment (median difference -8%) and cMRI (median difference -12%).
- Automated assessment yielded larger EDV and ESV compared to standard 2D tracings (P<0.001 for both).
- The automated method identified more patients (22%) with LVEF < 50% compared to expert assessment (12%).
Conclusions:
- Automated LV size and function assessments in HCM patients significantly differ from standard methods.
- Concerns exist regarding the use of ML-enabled LVEF software for this population.
- Further validation is needed before applying this technology to guide CMI treatments.
Aims:
Cardiac myosin inhibitors (CMIs) have revolutionized care for patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), however they are associated with a risk of systolic dysfunction. Machine learning algorithms might expand access to frequent accurate assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We assess the performance of a commercial ML-based LVEF model for patients with HCM.
Methods And Results:
Single centre prospective study of measurements of left ventricular function by Philips HeartModel® (automated) assessment, echocardiographer assessment (standard), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for patients with HCM. Assessments of LVEF, end diastolic volume and end systolic volume were studied across methods. 50 patients with HCM were included. Median age 64 years; 64% male; and 62% had cMRI data for analysis. Median automated LVEF was lower than standard [55.5% (IQR 9) vs. 62.5% (IQR 10), P 0.002, median difference-8% (IQR 14)] and cMRI assessment [55.5% (IQR 9) vs. 68% (IQR 9.5), P < 0.001, median difference-12% (IQR 16)]. Automated assessment traced larger EDVs and ESVs compared with standard 2D tracings [141 mL (IQR 66) vs. 114 mL (IQR 55), P 0.001, and 64 mL (IQR 35) vs. 41 mL (IQR 25), P < 0.001]. Automated assessment identified 11 (22%) patients as having LVEF < 50% vs. 6 (12%) patients identified by expert imaging assessment.
Conclusion:
For patients with HCM, automated assessments of LV size and function differ significantly from standard assessments, raising concerns about the use of this ML-enabled LVEF software for this patient population and potential application to guiding CMI treatments.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy VI: Nursing Management

