High-fructose corn syrup for managing negative energy balance in sheep
Brian Waiswa1,2, Alexander Rosov1, Dorit Kababya3
1Institute of Animal Science, Agricultural Research Organization-Volcani Institute, Rishon LeZion, 7505101, Israel.
None:
Ketosis and its severe complication in small ruminants, pregnancy toxemia, are major metabolic disorders characterized by hypoglycemia and high blood concentrations of β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA) resulting from negative energy balance (NEB). Although conventional treatments rely on glucogenic precursors like glycerol and propylene glycol, farmers often turn to lower-cost alternatives, including sugary soft drinks containing high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and carbonated water (cWater). In this study, we evaluated the relative contribution of the primary components of Coca-Cola (Coke), used here as a representative and readily accessible energy source, in mitigating NEB in sheep. Twenty-eight Afec-Assaf ewe lambs (N = 28), fasted for 48 h to induce NEB, were randomly assigned to four treatment groups (n = 7): 1 L of either Water, cWater, carbonated HFCS solution (cHFCS), or Coke. Blood samples were collected at 0 and 1, 2, and 3 h post-treatment to measure glucose and BHBA concentrations. Glucose area under the curve (AUC) values were highest in cHFCS (2339.5 ± 628.6 mg/dL × min) and Coke (1778.5 ± 437.6 mg/dL × min), intermediate in cWater (950.8 ± 391.3 mg/dL × min), and lowest in Water (570.0 ± 184.5 mg/dL × min). ANOVA indicated significant treatment effects (P <0.037), with post-hoc analysis showing that cHFCS yielded higher glucose AUC than Water (P <0.05). BHBA AUC also differed significantly among treatments (P <0.018), with greater effects for cHFCS (-4.72 ± 4.55 mM × min) and Coke (-5.59 ± 2.96 mM × min) compared with Water (-20.98 ± 5.1 mM × min) and cWater (-21.02 ± 5.12 mM × min). Pairwise comparisons showed no significant differences between cHFCS and Coke, but indicated a trend (P = 0.08) toward a greater response to cHFCS compared to Water and cWater. Overall, the results identify HFCS as the primary component of soft drinks responsible for improving NEB, suggesting that HFCS could represent a practical and economical energy supplement for on-farm ketosis management.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Energy Balance
Energy-requiring Steps of Glycolysis
Internal Energy
Balancing Redox Equations
Cloning of Dolly the Sheep
Energy Budgets


