Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

A Murine Model of Stent Implantation in the Carotid Artery for the Study of Restenosis
Published on: May 14, 2013
Association between antiphospholipid antibodies, rheumatic-immune inflammation, and coronary in-stent restenosis
Wenxing Mao1, Zhiming Wu1, You Wei1
1Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China.
Background:
Antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) and systemic rheumatic-immune inflammation (RII) may be associated with angiographic in-stent restenosis (ISR) after drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation. We prospectively evaluated these associations in a large Chinese cohort of DES recipients.
Methods:
In this prospective cohort, we enrolled 2,503 consecutive adults who received at least one new-generation DES between May 2022 and January 2024. Preprocedural blood samples were assessed for antiphospholipid antibodies (anticardiolipin IgG/IgM, anti-β2-glycoprotein I IgG/IgM, and lupus anticoagulant) and inflammatory biomarkers [RII; high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), interleukin-6 (IL-6), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), complement C3/C4, rheumatoid factor, and anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies]. At 12 months, invasive coronary angiography or coronary CT angiography (CCTA) was used to assess ISR. All ISR analyses were restricted to participants who completed 12-month imaging (the imaging-complete cohort). Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for prespecified clinical/lesion/stent covariates and imaging modality. Model performance was compared for a Clinical model vs. an immune-enhanced model (clinical + aPL + IL-6) with internal bootstrap validation. ICA-only analyses were prespecified. Clinically driven target-lesion revascularization (TLR) was evaluated with Cox models in all enrolled patients.
Results:
Of the 2,503 enrolled participants, 2,388 completed 12-month imaging, with ISR occurring in 193 participants (8.1%; 95% CI 6.9-9.1). In adjusted analyses, any aPL positivity (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.34-2.74) and IL-6 (per doubling) (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.10-1.42) were independently associated with ISR. Adding aPL and IL-6 improved discrimination (AUC 0.79 vs. 0.72, Δ = 0.07, p = 0.008), calibration, and reclassification (categorical NRI 0.18, integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) 0.04). Optimism-corrected AUC was 0.78. The findings were consistent in the ICA-only cohort (aPL OR 1.95; IL-6 OR 1.27). Over 12 months, TLR occurred in 100/2,503 (4.0%). aPL positivity (HR 2.08, 95% CI 1.36-3.18) and IL-6 (per doubling; HR 1.29, 95% CI 1.11-1.50) were associated with higher TLR risk.
Conclusion:
Baseline aPL seropositivity and higher IL-6 were associated with 12-month ISR and clinically driven TLR. Incorporating these immune markers improves risk discrimination beyond clinical and angiographic factors. External validation and interventional studies are warranted.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Inflammation
What is the Immune System?
Antibody Structure
Antibodies, also known as immunoglobulins (Ig), are essential players of the adaptive immune system. These antigen-binding proteins are produced by B cells and make up 20 percent of the total blood plasma by weight. In mammals, antibodies fall into five different classes, which each elicits a different biological response upon antigen binding.
The Y-Shaped Structure of Antibodies Consists of Four Polypeptide Chains
Antibodies consist of four polypeptide chains: two identical heavy...
Rheumatic Heart Disease I: Introduction
Humoral Immune Responses
Rheumatic Heart Disease IV: Nursing Management

