Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Modeling Stroke in Mice: Transient Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion via the External Carotid Artery
Published on: May 24, 2021
True versus pseudo-occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery in acute stroke: A multicenter MR angiography
Christian Heitkamp1, Pia Niederau2,3, Arndt-Hendrik Schievelkamp2
1Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Insights
Contrast-enhanced MRA can differentiate true from pseudo-occlusion of the internal carotid artery (ICA) in stroke patients. Experienced radiologists achieve higher accuracy, aiding optimal treatment selection for thrombectomy.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Radiology
- Vascular Imaging
Background:
- Distinguishing true from pseudo-occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) is critical for acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy.
- Pseudo-occlusion is defined as an isolated intracranial ICA thrombus that suppresses ascending blood flow.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) in differentiating true from pseudo-occlusion of the cervical ICA.
- To assess the diagnostic performance and inter-reader reliability of CE-MRA in this context.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 41 acute ischemic stroke patients who underwent thrombectomy.
- CE-MRA images were independently reviewed by six readers (fellows and board-certified radiologists).
- Reader assessments were compared against digital subtraction angiography (DSA) results.
Main Results:
- Pseudo-occlusion was present in 39% of patients (16/41).
- Aggregated sensitivity and specificity for CE-MRA were 72% and 86%, respectively.
- Board-certified radiologists demonstrated higher accuracy (81% sensitivity, 92% specificity) with substantial inter-reader agreement (κ=0.65).
Conclusions:
- CE-MRA is a feasible tool for differentiating true from pseudo-ICA occlusion, but requires specialized training and experience.
- Higher accuracy among experienced radiologists underscores the importance of expertise.
- Accurate differentiation aids in optimal material selection for endovascular treatment.
Introduction:
Differentiating true from pseudo-occlusion of the cervical internal carotid artery (ICA) in acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy is crucial but challenging. We aimed to investigate the ability of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) to differentiate true from pseudo-occlusion (defined as an isolated thrombus of the intracranial ICA suppressing ascending blood flow) of the cervical ICA in acute ischemic stroke patients.
Materials And Methods:
Multicenter, retrospective analysis of acute ischemic stroke patients with true or pseudo-occlusion of the cervical ICA and subsequent thrombectomy. Patients with preprocedural CE-MRA showing a lack of contrast filling in the cervical ICA on the symptomatic side were included. Six readers (three radiology fellows and three board-certified radiologists) independently evaluated the CE-MRA images for true or pseudo-occlusion of the cervical ICA using a rating scheme. Their assessments were compared with DSA results as the reference standard. Diagnostic accuracy measures, as well as inter- and intra-reader reliability for detecting pseudo-occlusion, were calculated and compared between subgroups.
Results:
A total of 41 patients were included. The median age was 73 years, and 39% were female. According to the reference standard, 16 of 41 (39%) patients had a pseudo-occlusion of the cervical ICA, while the remainder had a true occlusion. The aggregated sensitivity and specificity from all readers were 72% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 62%-81%) and 86% (95% CI: 79%-91%), respectively. Board-certified radiologists performed better, with a sensitivity of 81% (95% CI: 67%-91%) and specificity of 92% (95% CI: 83%-97%). Overall, inter-reader agreement was moderate (κ = 0.48; 95% CI: 0.31-0.65) and reached substantial agreement within the board-certified radiologists subgroup (κ = 0.65; 95% CI: 0.45-0.85).
Conclusion:
Differentiating true occlusion from pseudo-occlusion of the cervical ICA using CE-MRA is feasible but requires training in specific imaging characteristics as well as experience in interpreting them, as evidenced by the higher diagnostic accuracy of board-certified radiologists. Correct distinction help in optimal material selection (e.g. size and type of guiding catheter) prior to endovascular treatment.
Related Concept Videos
True Stress and True Strain
In contrast, true stress offers a more precise portrayal. It is computed by dividing the...
Internal Energy
Internal Energy
Internal Receptors
Acute Pyelonephritis II: Diagnostic Studies and Management
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies

