Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jan 31, 2026

Integrating Augmented Reality Tools in Breast Cancer Related Lymphedema Prognostication and Diagnosis
Published on: February 6, 2020
MRI response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognostic implications in breast cancer patients
Soraia Quaranta Damião1, Eduarda Ferreira Rodrigues da Cunha2, Monique Celeste Tavares3
1Department of Imaging, A.C. Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo 01509-001, SP, Brazil.
Objective:
To correlate response evaluation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), assessed by MRI and pathology, with disease-free survival (DFS) in breast cancer patients, according to immunophenotype.
Methods:
Single-centre, IRB-approved retrospective cohort study included consecutive breast cancer patients who underwent NAC and preoperative breast MRI. Pathologic response was evaluated using the residual cancer burden (RCB) system, with pathological complete response (pCR) defined as the absence of invasive carcinoma. Radiological complete response (rCR) was defined as the absence of abnormal enhancement on MRI. The Kaplan-Meier method estimated DFS and Cox regression analysis calculated hazard ratios (HRs).
Results:
Five hundred seventy-one patients were included (mean age 46 years, range 26-90). The most common immunophenotype was luminal (42.3%), followed by triple-negative (TNBC, 31.5%) and HER2 overexpressed (26.3%). Radiological and pathological responses were concordant in 71.5%. Overall, 35.2% achieved rCR and 37.5% achieved pCR. Disease-free survival curves did not differ significantly according to radiologic-pathologic response combinations in the luminal or HER2 groups (LogRank P = .505 and P = .257). In the TNBC group, patients without pCR or rCR had significantly worse DFS compared to those achieving either response (LogRank P = .001). Cox regression revealed that TNBC patients with both non-rCR and non-pCR had a markedly higher risk of recurrence or death (HR 7.728; 95% CI 2.696-22.149; P < .001).
Conclusions:
Integrating MRI and pathological response assessments after NAC may enhance risk stratification and prognostication, especially in triple-negative breast cancer.
Advances In Knowledge:
Patients with both non-rCR and non-pCR have significantly worse DFS, underscoring the prognostic value of combining imaging and pathological findings, particularly in TNBC.
More Related Videos
15:48Tracking the Mammary Architectural Features and Detecting Breast Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging
Published on: December 15, 2014
06:06High-Throughput Dissociation and Orthotopic Implantation of Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: December 20, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Cannabinoids
Two synthetic agonists of THC,...
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Dopamine Receptor Antagonists
Phenothiazines, such as prochlorperazine...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Neurokinin-1 Receptor Antagonists
Responses to Gravity and Touch