Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

10:26
Fabrication and Characterization of Superconducting Resonators
Published on: May 21, 2016
11.9K
Rigorous Theory of Coupled Resonators
1Cardiff University, School of Physics and Astronomy, Cardiff CF24 3AA, United Kingdom.
Physical Review Letters
|January 30, 2026
Summary
Modern theories of coupled open resonators fail for planar systems. A new rigorous theory correctly describes eigenmodes and mode hybridization in 3D dispersive coupled resonators, including planar configurations.
Area of Science:
- Photonics and Optical Physics
- Resonant Cavity Science
- Computational Electromagnetics
Background:
- Modern theories of coupled open resonators rely on tight binding and mode hybridization concepts.
- These theories have been widely applied but exhibit limitations in describing planar systems.
- Planar optical resonators, like dielectric slabs and microcavities, are crucial in various photonic applications.
Purpose of the Study:
- To demonstrate the failure of existing theories for planar coupled open resonators.
- To develop and present a rigorous theory for calculating eigenmodes of 3D dispersive coupled resonators.
- To reveal accurate mode hybridization and supermode formation in coupled resonator systems.
Main Methods:
- Analytical verification of existing theories for simple planar systems.
- Development of a rigorous mathematical framework for arbitrary 3D dispersive coupled resonators.
- Calculation of eigenmodes based on individual resonator modes.
Main Results:
- The study demonstrates the general failure of tight binding and mode hybridization theories for planar coupled resonators.
- A new rigorous theory accurately predicts eigenmodes and mode hybridization.
- The theory reveals the formation of bonding and antibonding supermodes.
Conclusions:
- Existing theories for coupled open resonators are insufficient for planar configurations.
- The presented rigorous theory provides an accurate method for analyzing complex coupled resonator systems.
- This work advances the understanding of light-matter interactions in photonic devices.
Related Concept Videos
Scientific Laws and Theories
88.2K
Scientific Laws
88.2K
Band Theory
17.2K
When two or more atoms come together to form a molecule, their atomic orbitals combine and molecular orbitals of distinct energies result. In a solid, there are a large number of atoms, and therefore a large number of atomic orbitals that may be combined into molecular orbitals. These groups of molecular orbitals are so closely placed together to form continuous regions of energies, known as the bands.
The energy difference between these bands is known as the band gap.
Conductor, Semiconductor,...
The energy difference between these bands is known as the band gap.
Conductor, Semiconductor,...
17.2K
Resonance
65.3K
The Lewis structure of a nitrite anion (NO2−) may actually be drawn in two different ways, distinguished by the locations of the N-O and N=O bonds.
65.3K
Attribution Theory
13.8K
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958).
13.8K
The Atomic Theory of Matter
128.0K
The earliest recorded discussion of the basic structure of matter comes from ancient Greek philosophers. Leucippus and Democritus argued that all matter was composed of small, finite particles that they called atomos, meaning “indivisible.” Later, Aristotle and others came to the conclusion that matter consisted of various combinations of the four “elements” — fire, earth, air, and water — and could be infinitely divided. Interestingly, these philosophers...
128.0K
Social Exchange Theory
40.8K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
40.8K

