Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
The predictive value of MR cytometry in histological differentiation of rectal cancer: an exploratory study
Qing Zhao1,2, Diwei Shi3,4, Hongxia Zhong1
1Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
Purpose:
To investigate and compare the diagnostic value of different MR cytometry methods in predicting histological differentiation of rectal tumors.
Materials And Methods:
This prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT07107815) enrolled eligible patients with rectal cancer from March 2025 to July 2025. All patients underwent rectal MRI with oscillating gradient spin-echo and pulsed gradient spin-echo sequences. Microstructural parameters were obtained from three different MR cytometry methods. Based on pathological results, rectal tumors were classified as poor differentiation and well/moderate differentiation. Intergroup comparison was conducted using Mann-Whitney U-test. The diagnostic value of imaging metrics, including microstructural parameters and apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs), in distinguishing rectal cancers with different histological differentiation was evaluated by logistic regression analysis.
Results:
A total of 86 patients were included (mean age: 60.5 ± 10.7 years; male proportion: 66.3%; maximal tumor diameter: 38.7 ± 11.1 mm), including 37 with poor differentiation, 49 with well/moderate differentiation. Intracellular volume fraction and cellularity were higher (p < 0.0001), while extracellular diffusivity, water exchange rate constant, and ADC metrics were lower (p-values from 0.01 to < 0.0001) in the poor-differentiation group. Among the classifiers based on a single imaging metric, intracellular volume fraction provided the highest areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC = 0.812). Clinical performance of the combined regression models incorporating microstructural parameters and ADC metrics (AUC = 0.883) was significantly superior to the conventional ADC measurement (AUC = 0.795).
Conclusion:
MR cytometry provides additional information over ADC measurements in identifying histological differentiation grades of rectal cancer; the integration of MR cytometry into clinical scans may improve the diagnostic performance of rectal MRI.
Key Points:
Question Microstructural parameters obtained from MR cytometry methods and apparent diffusion coefficients showed significant differences between rectal tumors with different histological differentiation grades. Findings The combined regression models, including both microstructural parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient metrics, provided a significantly higher value than the conventional PGSE-based ADC measurement. Clinical relevance Incorporating transcytolemmal water exchange into biophysical modeling can further improve the clinical performance over the impermeable model.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Body Temperature - Rectal
Follow these steps for rectal temperature assessment:
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don clean gloves to prevent cross-infection.
Step 2: Position the patient in a side-lying position to better visualize the rectal...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
Stomach Histology
Liver Histology
Hepatocytes perform a variety of essential functions. They secrete...
Histology of the Large Intestine
The innermost mucosa layer comprises simple columnar epithelium, lamina propria, and muscularis mucosae. This layer is primarily populated with absorptive cells, tasked with water absorption, and goblet cells, responsible for secreting mucus to...
Prediction Intervals
However, the point estimate is most likely not the exact value of the population parameter, but close to it. After calculating point estimates, we construct interval estimates, called confidence intervals or prediction intervals. This prediction interval comprises a range of values unlike the point estimate and is a better predictor of the observed sample value, y.

