Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Analysis of SNARE-mediated Membrane Fusion Using an Enzymatic Cell Fusion Assay
Published on: October 19, 2012
Chikungunya virus E1 fusion loop-membrane interaction: Conserved residues and shallow insertion
Naresh Kumar Gudigamolla1, Birupaksha Das1, Preeti Pragya Panda1
1School of Biological Sciences, National Institute of Science Education and Research, Bhubaneswar, An Off-Campus Center of Homi Bhabha National Institute, PO Jatni, Khorda, Odisha 752050, India.
Abstract:
Fusion of viral and cellular membranes, essential for entry of enveloped viruses, is mediated by viral fusion proteins (FPs). These proteins insert hydrophobic elements into target membranes to destabilize bilayers and drive fusion. For class I FPs, sequence and structural requirements of the fusion peptide are well characterized. In contrast, class II FPs, such as the alphavirus E1 glycoprotein, employ compact fusion loops, whose conserved sequence and structural features remain less understood. Here, we examined the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) E1 fusion loop using molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, mutational analysis, depth-dependent fluorescence quenching, liposome fusion assays, and Langmuir monolayer experiments. Comparative analyses of alphavirus and flavivirus fusion loops identified a conserved glycine at the N terminus and a tryptophan at the loop tip. Atomistic and coarse-grained MD simulations revealed that the loop inserts shallow into the lipid headgroup region, adopting a tilted interfacial orientation stabilized by hydrogen bonding. Depth probing by tryptophan fluorescence quenching in the parallax method confirmed placement of Trp89 at the headgroup-acyl chain boundary. Functional assays showed that substitution of the conserved glycine (G83A) abolished both membrane insertion and fusion, whereas W89A retained near-wild-type activity. Langmuir monolayer measurements further demonstrated that the E1 protein decreased compressibility and altered lipid packing, whereas with the W89A mutant, the effect is reduced, implying that both G83 and W89 in the CHIKV E1 fusion loop contribute to membrane destabilization. These findings establish that class II fusion loops employ shallow, interfacial anchoring mediated by conserved residues. This mode of binding perturbs lipid organization sufficiently to promote fusion, defining a conserved mechanistic principle that distinguishes class II fusion loops from the deeper-penetrating peptides of class I proteins.
More Related Videos
07:22A High-throughput Cre-Lox Activated Viral Membrane Fusion Assay to Identify Inhibitors of HIV-1 Viral Membrane Fusion
Published on: August 14, 2018
10:51Reverse Yeast Two-hybrid System to Identify Mammalian Nuclear Receptor Residues that Interact with Ligands and/or Antagonists
Published on: November 15, 2013
Related Concept Videos
SNAREs and Membrane Fusion
SNAREs exist in pairs that symmetrically interact and catalyze the fusion of the lipid bilayers in vesicle and target organelle. v-SNARE in the vesicle membrane are single polypeptide chains that bind to a complementary t-SNARE, composed of 2...
Porin Insertion in the Outer Mitochondrial Membrane
Three models describe the assembly of porins by the SAM complex and their insertion into the outer membrane. Model 1 suggests that porins are assembled outside the SAM channel as the...
Fusion of Secretory Vesicles with the Plasma Membrane
In 1993, Jim Rothman proposed that the antiparallel pairing of vesicular and transmembrane SNAREs, or...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally...
What is Conservation Biology?
Conservation of Small Populations