Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 1, 2026

Measurement of Neurophysiological Signals of Ignoring and Attending Processes in Attention Control
Published on: July 5, 2015
Distinctive neurophysiological correlates of sound onset and offset perception in humans
Fatima Ali1, Gabriela Bury1, Adèle Simon1
1Ear Institute, University College London, London, UK.
None:
Accurate detection of sound onsets and offsets is thought to be vital for speech perception. Sound-onset event-related potentials (ERPs) have been well characterised in EEG studies, but the characteristics of sound-offset ERPs have often been obscured by temporal confounds in experimental design. Here two EEG studies were conducted in human listeners performing an interval duration discrimination task with (i) noise intervals in silence or (ii) silent intervals (gaps) in noise. Stimuli used in the active task were also presented under passive listening conditions with no participant response required. This design enabled us to investigate whether features of the offset ERP could be masked by task demands, and whether the usual temporal precedence of the onset event in a sound influences the relative magnitude and shape of onset and offset ERPs. The morphology of the offset ERP was distinct from that of the onset ERP in both noise and silent interval duration discrimination tasks, even though the functional roles of onsets and offsets as start-interval versus end-interval cues were reversed between the two tasks. This observation corroborates evidence from animal studies that there are fundamental differences in the brain mechanisms of onset and offset perception. In all experimental conditions, the amplitude of the offset ERP was one-third to one-half that of the onset ERP. Differences between active and passive listening conditions were largely explained by enhancement of ERPs for whichever transient marked the end of the discriminated intervals. However, this context dependence emerged in earlier ERP waves for offset than onset responses. KEY POINTS: Onset and offset event-related potentials (ERPs) differ in morphology and amplitude. For both onset and offset ERPs, P200 and later waves depend on behavioural context. For offset ERPs only, P100/N100 waves also depend on behavioural context. Engagement in duration discrimination alters ERPs primarily at the end of intervals.
Related Concept Videos
Perception of Sound Waves
The pitch of a sound depends on the frequency and the pressure amplitude of the source. Two sounds of the same...
Correlations
Subliminal Perception
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Correlation and Causation
Correlation versus Causation
If the dependent variable increases or decreases when the independent variable increases, there is a positive or negative...
Perception
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...

