Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Shugan Jieyu Capsules for the Treatment of Insomnia
Published on: February 17, 2023
The prevalence of atypical bilateral trigger thumb in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Miao Xinling1, Tang Qingsong2, Li Xiahui3
1School of Nursing, Chengdu university, Chengdu, China.
Insights
Atypical pediatric bilateral trigger thumb occurs in 5.9% of cases, with metachronism in 3.4% and inconsistent severity in 10.7%. A 12-18 month observation period is recommended before surgery to avoid unnecessary procedures.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Orthopedics
- Hand Surgery
- Clinical Epidemiology
Background:
- Trigger thumb is a common pediatric hand condition with debated surgical observation periods.
- Atypical bilateral trigger thumb involves metachronism or inconsistent lesion severity.
- Understanding bilateral lesion prevalence can prevent unnecessary surgeries and anesthetic exposure.
Purpose of the Study:
- To estimate the prevalence of atypical pediatric bilateral trigger thumb.
- To determine optimal observation duration before surgical intervention.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review following PRISMA guidelines, registered in PROSPERO.
- Searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases.
- Random-effects meta-analysis of five studies (1240 thumbs) with quality assessment and subgroup analyses.
Main Results:
- Pooled prevalence of atypical pediatric bilateral trigger thumb is 5.9% (95% CI 2.7-12.3).
- Prevalence of metachronism was 3.4% (95% CI 2.5-4.8), and inconsistent severity was 10.7% (95% CI 3.1-30.7).
- Metachronism spanned 12-18 months, with initial visits between 20.1-31 months.
Conclusions:
- Bilateral trigger thumb can present with metachronism and varying severity.
- An observation period of 12-18 months is supported to minimize unnecessary procedures.
- Further large-scale randomized controlled trials are needed to strengthen evidence.
Background:
Trigger thumb is a common hand condition in children, and the necessity of observing a period before surgery is debated due to factors such as the metachronism of bilateral lesions, inconsistent severity, and rates of spontaneous resolution. The exact prevalence of bilateral lesions in these cases remains uncertain. Understanding these rates could help avoid unnecessary surgeries and reduce anesthetic exposure. This systematic review defines atypical bilateral trigger thumb as either metachronous or exhibiting inconsistent bilateral lesions. Its aim is to estimate the overall prevalence of atypical pediatric bilateral trigger thumb and determine the optimal observation duration to prevent unwarranted surgeries.
Methods:
This study followed the PRISMA guidelines and registered in the PROSPERO. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all relevant studies up to August 2025. The Joanna Briggs Institute's quality assessment checklist was utilized to evaluate study quality. A random-effects meta-analysis was employed to synthesize prevalence rates from individual studies. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses were conducted to identify sources of heterogeneity and compare prevalence estimates.
Results:
A total of five studies were included for the final analysis, with 1240 pediatric trigger thumbs. Our final meta-analysis showed that the pooled prevalence estimate of atypical pediatric bilateral trigger thumb was determined to be 5.9% (95% CI 2.7- 12.3). Significant heterogeneity was observed across the studies included in this analysis (I² = 85%; P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed that the pooled prevalence of metachronisim and inconsistent degree was 3.4% (95% CI 2.5- 4.8, p < 0.001) and 10.7% (95% CI 3.1- 30.7, p = 0.002), respectively. Three studies reported the age at the first visit ranged from 20.1 to 31 months, while the period of metachronism spanned from 12 to 18 months.
Conclusion:
Our study demonstrates that some cases of pediatric trigger thumb exhibit bilateral metachronism and varying degrees of severity, supporting a period of 12 to 18 months of observation before surgical intervention to minimize the risk of unnecessary or secondary procedures. Given the limited evidence in this systematic review and meta-analysis, it is imperative that future research includes rigorously designed, large-sample randomized controlled trials to strengthen the evidence base.
Trial Registration:
PROSPERO (CRD42024562483).
Related Concept Videos
Prevalence and Incidence
Prevalence indicates the proportion of individuals in a population who have a specific disease or health...
Review and Preview
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
Review and Preview
Antipsychotic Drugs: Typical and Atypical Agents
Random and Systematic Errors
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups

