Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 3, 2026

Fetal Echocardiography and Pulsed-wave Doppler Ultrasound in a Rabbit Model of Intrauterine Growth Restriction
Published on: June 29, 2013
Evaluating the Need for Multiple Ultrasound Measurements for Accurate Prediction of Birthweight Using Estimated Fetal
Madeleine E St Ville1, Katherine L Grantz2, Jessica L Gleason2
1Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Branch, Division of Population Health Research, Division of Intramural Research, Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Objectives:
To evaluate whether averaging replicate fetal biometry measurements during an examination improves estimated fetal weight (EFW) accuracy for predicting birthweight compared with a single set and to assess how variability in fetal biometric measurements changes across gestation.
Methods:
Secondary analysis of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child and Health and Human Development (NICHD) Fetal Growth Studies-Singletons. At each study visit, fetal head circumference (HC), abdominal circumference (AC), and femur length (FL) were measured in triplicate to compute EFW at each of 6 study visits (0-5). Variability among replicates was assessed across gestation using boxplots and two-way repeated measures ANOVA. For participants with visit 5 EFW (n = 1101), predictive accuracy of each individual measurement and their averages was compared with birthweight using average percent error and proportion within 10% of birthweight. One-way ANOVA and chi-square tests were applied. Sensitivity analyses included second-to-last visit, subgroups classified as small- or large-for-gestational age, and a subgroup of participants who delivered within 3 days of visit 5.
Results:
Across visits, replicate HC, AC, and FL showed minimal variability, with no significant differences among replicates or across gestation. At visit 5, average EFW and standard deviations were similar across individual and averaged measurements. Percent errors ranged from 8.2 to 8.5% (p = .999), and proportion within 10% of birthweight ranged from 64.4 to 66.4% (p = .954). Sensitivity analyses produced similarly null findings.
Conclusions:
In a controlled research setting with credentialed sonographers and standardized protocols, averaging replicate fetal biometric measurements did not improve EFW prediction of birthweight. A single high-quality measurement of fetal biometry may be sufficient, although further research is warranted to confirm generalizability to routine clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...
Predicting Molecular Geometry
What are Estimates?
The estimate for the mean of a sample is denoted by ͞x, whereas the mean of the population is designated as μ. Further, parameters such...
Fetal Circulation
Two umbilical arteries transport blood from the fetus to the placenta. At the placenta, the blood absorbs oxygen and nutrients while simultaneously eliminating waste products. This oxygen-enriched and nutrient-rich blood then returns to the fetus through one...
Atomic Weight
Mass and Weight

