Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
A Dual-Perspective Comparison of Classical and Clinic-Based Multidisciplinary Team Models in Cancer Care: A
Mengying Li1,2, Leihua Chen2,3, Yanbing Liu1,2
1Party and Government General Office, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center Shanghai China.
Background And Aims:
Multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) represent a key trend in global cancer care. This study aims to discuss the applicability and benefits of two MDT models in a Chinese tertiary cancer hospital, the classical MDT consultation meeting model and the MDT clinic model, regarding process and efficiency, physicians' preferences, and patients' satisfaction.
Methods:
We conducted a user-side cross-sectional survey among patients in MDT clinics (n = 520) and consultation meetings (n = 123) via convenience sampling. The survey captured basic information, treatment results, and satisfaction (5-point Likert scale). On the provider side, semistructured interviews were conducted among 28 physicians on MDTs, focusing on the team's working mode and communication style.
Results:
Since 2005, the hospital has established 15 MDTs. The classical model, operating on a fixed schedule, is valued by physicians for educating young staff. Since 2020, MDT clinics in 8 disciplines have streamlined the appointment process and involved patients directly in discussions. The majority of physicians (25/28) affirmed that this model has improved the efficiency of developing diagnostic and treatment plans. The overall satisfaction of patients with the MDT clinic was (4.66 ± 0.54), which was higher than their satisfaction with the classical MDT model (4.53 ± 0.53). In the MDT clinic model, non-local patients reported greater satisfaction (4.68 ± 0.58) than did local patients (4.65 ± 0.53), while the opposite was true of the classical MDT model. Patients with more complex tumor types (F = 2.35), longer wait times (F = 9.53), or no clear treatment plan (t = 9.49) reported lower satisfaction with both models (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
For regional hubs featuring the necessary resources, the establishment of a multidisciplinary clinic model for diagnosis and treatment is strongly encouraged. The classical MDT meeting is indispensable for complex case deliberation and physician training, while the multidisciplinary clinic model can be utilized to enhance patient-centered care and satisfaction.
Related Concept Videos
Cross-Sectional Research
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-I
Physicians
The physician's primary responsibility is to diagnose illness and direct the medical or surgical treatment of the condition. The authority to admit patients to a healthcare agency or institution and practice care within that setting is granted to physicians by the healthcare agency or institution...
Interdisciplinary Care: The Health Care Team-II
Physical Therapist
A physical therapist (PT) aims to restore function or prevent additional impairment in a patient following an injury or disease. Massage, heat, cold, water, sonar waves, exercises, and electrical stimulation are some treatments used by PTs to treat...
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...
Finding Volume Using Cross-Sectional Area
Profile Leveling and Cross Sections

