Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

How to Obtain Reliable Visual Event-related Potentials in Newborns
Published on: October 24, 2019
Effect of oromotor stimulation on early sucking behavior and later development in preterm newborns
Ankit Jain1, Sardar Vikram Singh Bais2, Akash Yadav3
1Department of Pediatrics, Shyam Shah Medical College and Associated Gandhi Memorial hospital, Chakaraghat, Sagar, Madhya Pradesh, India.
Insights
Standard care for preterm infants (<34 weeks) promotes earlier oral feeding and better growth compared to oromotor stimulation (OMS) interventions. This approach also enhances neurodevelopmental outcomes, proving more effective for infant feeding and development.
Area of Science:
- Neonatal Medicine
- Developmental Pediatrics
- Clinical Nutrition
Background:
- Preterm infants (<34 weeks gestation) frequently experience feeding challenges due to underdeveloped oromotor coordination.
- Feeding difficulties in preterm neonates can impede growth and prolong hospitalization.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the efficacy of structured oromotor stimulation (OMS), unstructured stimulation, and standard care in preterm infants.
- To evaluate the impact of different feeding interventions on oral feeding acquisition, growth, and neurodevelopmental outcomes.
Main Methods:
- A randomized controlled trial involving 150 preterm infants was conducted.
- Infants were assigned to receive structured OMS, unstructured stimulation, or standard care.
- Outcomes measured included time to full oral feeding, weight gain, hospital stay duration, and neurodevelopmental scores at 6 months.
Main Results:
- Standard care resulted in significantly earlier full oral feeding (8.84 ± 2.37 days) compared to OMS interventions.
- Infants receiving standard care exhibited greater weight gain (40.04 ± 6.92%) and shorter hospital stays (24.16 ± 4.52 days) (p < 0.001).
- Neurodevelopmental scores at 6 months were significantly higher in the standard care group.
Conclusions:
- Standard care is more effective than oromotor stimulation (OMS) interventions for improving feeding, growth, and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.
- The findings suggest that standard care protocols may be optimal for supporting preterm infant development and reducing healthcare burdens.
Abstract:
Preterm infants (<34 weeks) often face feeding difficulties due to immature oromotor coordination. This randomized controlled trial of 150 preterm infants compared structured OMS, unstructured stimulation and standard care. Standard care led to earlier full oral feeding (8.84 ± 2.37 days), greater weight gain (40.04 ± 6.92%) and shorter hospital stay (24.16 ± 4.52 days) (p < 0.001). Developmental scores at 6 months were significantly higher with standard care than with OMS interventions. Standard care proved more effective than OMS in enhancing feeding, growth and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
What is Behavior?
Behaviorism
The core premise of behaviorism is its focus on observable behavior rather than internal thoughts or feelings. This approach argues that true scientific...
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
Sustainable Development
Plastic Behavior
Electron Behavior
Electrons Orbit the Nucleus
Electrons are found in specific locations outside of the nucleus. The shell in which an electron resides indicates the general energy level of the electron: those closer to the nucleus have less energy,...

