Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Intraoperative Gastroscopy for Tumor Localization in Laparoscopic Surgery for Gastric Adenocarcinoma
Published on: August 9, 2016
Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy versus Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Gastric Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction
Xiaowen Liu1,2, Jiejie Jin1,2, Menglong Zhou2,3,4
1Department of Gastric Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, P. R. China.
Abstract:
Background: The prognostic superiority of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (pre-CRT) over preoperative chemotherapy (pre-CT) in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer remains controversial. Herein, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of pre-CRT relative to those of pre-CT in this cohort. Methods: This open-label, phase III, randomized controlled trial was conducted at 4 medical centers in China. Eligible patients with locally advanced gastric cancer or esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either 3 cycles of oxaliplatin and S-1 (SOX), followed by surgery and 3 postoperative cycles of SOX (pre-CT), or 1 cycle of SOX, followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy, a second cycle of SOX, surgery, and 3 postoperative cycles of SOX (pre-CRT). The primary endpoint was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints included 3-year overall survival (OS), R0 resection rate, pathological complete response (pCR) rate, treatment-related toxicity, and postoperative complications. Results: Due to premature trial termination, only 204 patients were enrolled, and an efficacy analysis was conducted on 194 eligible patients. The baseline characteristics were well balanced between the 2 groups. The DFS and OS were indistinguishable between the 2 groups. The 3-year DFS rates were 53.6% in the pre-CRT group and 53.9% in the pre-CT group [hazard ratio (HR), 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70 to 1.50; log-rank P = 0.913]. The 3-year OS rates were 62.8% in the pre-CRT group and 60.5% in the pre-CT group (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.63 to 1.47; log-rank P = 0.874). The R0 resection rates were 81.0% and 74.5% in the pre-CRT and pre-CT groups, respectively. Additionally, the pCR rate was higher in the pre-CRT group (12.0%) than in the pre-CT group (2.1%). Treatment-related toxic effects were comparable between the 2 groups. Conclusion: This trial did not demonstrate a survival advantage for pre-CRT over pre-CT in patients with locally advanced gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma.
Related Concept Videos
Gastric Phase of Digestion
When food enters the stomach, it stretches the stomach walls and activates stretch receptors. This triggers local reflexes of the enteric nervous system, mediated through the myenteric plexus. These...
Phase-lead and Phase-lag Controllers
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lead Control
The design of phase-lead control involves the strategic placement of poles and zeros to balance steady-state error and system...
Time and frequency -Domain Interpretation of Phase-lag Control
Phase-lag controllers do not place a pole at zero, but instead influence the steady-state error by amplifying any...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Trial and Error and Algorithm

