Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs02:39

lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs

9.9K
In humans, more than 80% of the genome gets transcribed. However, only around 2% of the genome codes for proteins. The remaining part produces non-coding RNAs which includes ribosomal RNAs, transfer RNAs, telomerase RNAs, and regulatory RNAs, among other types. A large number of regulatory non-coding RNAs have been classified into two groups depending upon their length – small non-coding RNAs, such as microRNA, which are less than 200 nucleotides in length, and long non-coding RNA...
9.9K
lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs02:39

lncRNA - Long Non-coding RNAs

3.7K
3.7K
Nursing Code of Ethics01:29

Nursing Code of Ethics

4.5K
The Nursing Code of Ethics sets the ethical benchmark for the profession, and guides nurses in ethical analysis and decision making at the societal, organizational, and clinical levels. The code encompasses showing compassion and respect for the patient, their families, and communities in all circumstances while committing to providing patient-centered care. In addition, the code states that nurses must advocate for the patient by defending a cause or recommendation to protect their rights,...
4.5K
Electric Potential and Potential Difference01:16

Electric Potential and Potential Difference

5.7K
Suppose a positive test charge moves away from a positive static charge, then the Coulomb force does positive work, and its electric potential energy decreases. The potential energy per unit charge is defined as the electric potential. The electric potential is independent of the test charge.
When a test charge moves from the initial to the final position, the electric potential difference between those positions is defined as the ratio of the change in the potential energy to the charge on the...
5.7K
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

8.3K
The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
8.3K
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test01:14

Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test

3.8K
The F-test is used to compare two sample variances to each other or compare the sample variance to the population variance. It is used to decide whether an indeterminate error can explain the difference in their values. The underlying assumptions that allow the use of the F-test include the data set or sets are normally distributed, and the data sets are independent of each other. The test statistic F is calculated by dividing one variance by another. In other words, the square of one standard...
3.8K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Emerging healthcare news.

General dentistry·2026
Same author

Preparing to facilitate simulated learning.

British journal of nursing (Mark Allen Publishing)·2026
Same author

Modulation of Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Levels of Glutamate and GABA by Ketamine in Treatment-Resistant Depression.

Journal of neuroscience research·2025
Same author

Intrathecal Dexamethasone as a FIRES Extinguisher: A 12-Patient Clinical Experience with Usage of Intrathecal Dexamethasone for Febrile Infection-Related Epilepsy Syndrome.

Neurocritical care·2025
Same author

The utility of serum neurofilament light chain in MOGAD: Current insights and future directions.

Multiple sclerosis and related disorders·2025
Same author

Canadian Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Encephalitis in Adults.

The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques·2024
Same journal

The impact of cash and near-cash social policies on substance use outcomes: a scoping review.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same journal

The financial implications of selective disenrollment from Medicare advantage.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same journal

Capturing incarceration in the medical record: we cannot manage what we cannot measure.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same journal

Effect of an out-of-pocket insulin cap in Medicare part D.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same journal

Using prescription drug data for timely assessments of state insurance coverage rates: a validation study.

Health affairs scholar·2026
Same journal

The hidden costs of becoming a nurse: how student debt deepens inequities in the nursing workforce pipeline.

Health affairs scholar·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K

An updated analysis of coding pattern differences in Medicare Advantage.

Joe Albanese1, Alec Aramanda1, John Brooks2

  • 1Center for Medicare, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC 20201, United States.

Health Affairs Scholar
|February 2, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Medicare Advantage (MA) coding intensity is estimated at 1.5%-2.0% relative to Original Medicare (OM) in 2022. This lower estimate suggests prior policy changes may have impacted federal spending in MA.

Keywords:
Department of Health and Human Services, HHSMedicare Payment Advisory Commission, MedPACMedicare advantage Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, CMScoding intensitymedicarerisk adjustment

More Related Videos

Visualizing Motion Patterns in Acupuncture Manipulation
08:18

Visualizing Motion Patterns in Acupuncture Manipulation

Published on: July 16, 2016

9.2K
Identification of Coding and Non-coding RNA Classes Expressed in Swine Whole Blood
09:40

Identification of Coding and Non-coding RNA Classes Expressed in Swine Whole Blood

Published on: November 28, 2018

7.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis
13:51

Cross-Modal Multivariate Pattern Analysis

Published on: November 9, 2011

20.5K
Visualizing Motion Patterns in Acupuncture Manipulation
08:18

Visualizing Motion Patterns in Acupuncture Manipulation

Published on: July 16, 2016

9.2K
Identification of Coding and Non-coding RNA Classes Expressed in Swine Whole Blood
09:40

Identification of Coding and Non-coding RNA Classes Expressed in Swine Whole Blood

Published on: November 28, 2018

7.8K

Area of Science:

  • Health Economics
  • Health Policy
  • Medicare Risk Adjustment

Background:

  • Diagnostic coding intensity in Medicare Advantage (MA) significantly influences Medicare's fiscal costs through risk adjustment payments.
  • Estimating these coding differentials is crucial for understanding the financial relationship between MA and Original Medicare (OM).

Purpose of the Study:

  • To provide updated estimates of coding intensity differentials between MA and OM.
  • To incorporate recent policy changes and the v28 risk adjustment model into these estimates.

Main Methods:

  • Recalculated 2022 national average enrollment-weighted risk scores for MA and OM using the v28 risk adjustment model.
  • Employed a demographic-only risk adjustment model to estimate health status differences.
  • Applied a methodology consistent with prominent research on coding intensity.

Main Results:

  • Estimated uncorrected coding intensity in MA relative to OM at 1.5%-2.0% for 2022.
  • These estimates account for mandated payment adjustments and recent MA risk adjustment model changes.

Conclusions:

  • The lower estimated coding intensity contrasts with alternative estimates around 10%.
  • Prior policy interventions may have influenced federal spending within MA.
  • Findings inform discussions on the fiscal balance between MA and OM.