Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Computed Tomography-guided Time-domain Diffuse Fluorescence Tomography in Small Animals for Localization of Cancer Biomarkers
Published on: July 17, 2012
Predictors of Successful First-Attempt Prostate Cancer Computed Tomography Simulation: A Prospective Cohort Study
Karishma George1, Demetra Yannitsos2, Ashok Natarajan1
1Radiation Oncology, Tom Baker Cancer Centre, Calgary, Canada.
Purpose:
Successful computed tomography (CT) simulation in prostate cancer radiation therapy relies on consistent bowel and bladder preparation. This study aimed to determine the first-attempt CT simulation success rate and identify factors associated with a successful simulation.
Methods And Materials:
This single-institution, prospective cohort study recruited patients with prostate cancer undergoing CT simulation for pelvic radiation. We abstracted the success of CT simulation on the first attempt, the number of scan attempts in a single visit, the reason for failed attempt(s), and the frequency of rescheduled appointments. Patients completed a survey regarding their preparation experiences, demographic data, and patient-reported outcomes. The primary outcome was a successful first-attempt CT scan. A generalized estimating equation model evaluated factors associated with successful first scan, including age, CT appointment time, American Urological Association urinary symptom scores, constipation, diarrhea, and instruction format. Additionally, qualitative analysis of open-text patient feedback explored barriers to effective preparation.
Results:
Among 247 patients, 31.2% had a successful first-attempt CT simulation, while 52.2% required multiple attempts on the same day, and 16.6% needed rescheduling. Bladder and bowel issues contributed to 30.8% and 22.7% of failed attempts, respectively. Patients who received both verbal and written instructions were significantly more likely to succeed (adjusted odds ratio 1.82, P = .01) compared to verbal instructions alone. Qualitative analysis of 118 patient comments revealed common barriers, including unclear preparation instructions (23.7%), difficulty timing bowel movements (10.2%), and confusion about expectations (14.4%).
Conclusions:
Low CT simulation success rates emphasize the need for improved patient preparation strategies. Multimodal education significantly enhanced success rates. Addressing communication methods and, refining preparation protocols should reduce rescans, and optimize workflows.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Ecological Succession
Imaging Studies II: Positron Emission Tomography and Scintigraphy
Fundamental Principles of PET
Mouse Models of Cancer Study
The development of transgenic, knockout, and knock-in mice has led to an exponential increase in their use as model organisms in research,...
Design Example: Traverse Angle Computations

