Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Review and Preview01:10

Review and Preview

8.4K
In statistics, several tools are used to interpret the data. Measures of central tendency represent the characteristics of the data, such as mean, median, and mode. Additionally, measures of variance like standard deviation and range are used to find the spread of data from the mean. Relative standing measures the distance between data locations. Commonly used measures of relative standings are percentile, z score, and quartiles.
Percentiles are a type of fractile that partition data into...
8.4K
Review and Preview01:13

Review and Preview

11.3K
Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative continuous, or quantitative discrete. Because it is not practical to measure the entire population in a study, researchers use samples to represent the population. A random sample is a representative group from the population chosen by using a method that gives each individual in the population an equal chance of being included in the sample. Random...
11.3K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

14.9K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
14.9K
Systematic Sampling Method01:17

Systematic Sampling Method

13.3K
Sampling is a technique to select a portion (or subset) of the larger population and study that portion (the sample) to gain information about the population. Data are the result of sampling from a population. The sampling method ensures that samples are drawn without bias and accurately represent the population. Because measuring the entire population in a study is not practical, researchers use samples to represent the population of interest.
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
13.3K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

1.5K
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
1.5K
Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors01:15

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

11.0K
In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...
11.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Reply to Shankar regarding 'Antenatal lifestyle interventions to reduce gestational weight gain: Where should we start and how much will it cost?'

Public health·2026
Same author

Lipidomic profiling reveals a distinct lipidomic signature of early gestational diabetes.

Communications medicine·2026
Same author

Externally validated risk prediction models for gestational diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica·2026
Same author

Exosome-enriched extracellular vesicles are associated with Getah virus RNA and transmission-related readouts <i>in vitro</i>.

Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology·2026
Same author

Association Between Mental Health of Patients with Work-Related Injury and Their Compensation Claim Status: Exploratory Findings from the IMPRovE Trial.

Journal of occupational rehabilitation·2026
Same author

Implementing systems- and organisational-level change to advance gender equality in healthcare leadership: a mixed-methods implementation protocol.

Implementation science communications·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Use of High-Throughput Automated Microbioreactor System for Production of Model IgG1 in CHO Cells
08:15

Use of High-Throughput Automated Microbioreactor System for Production of Model IgG1 in CHO Cells

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.5K

Automated citation searching in systematic review production: A simulation study.

Darren Rajit1, Lan Du2, Helena Teede1,3

  • 1Monash Centre for Health Research and Implementation, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing, and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.

Research Synthesis Methods
|February 2, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Automated citation searching using OpenAlex and Semantic Scholar shows promise for systematic reviews. While it improved precision and F1 scores, recall was lower, suggesting its use as a supplementary strategy.

Keywords:
automationevidence synthesisguideline developmentlearning health systemsscoping reviewsystematic reviews

More Related Videos

Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists
05:22

Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists

Published on: August 11, 2023

2.8K
Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication
07:21

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

Published on: February 9, 2011

14.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Use of High-Throughput Automated Microbioreactor System for Production of Model IgG1 in CHO Cells
08:15

Use of High-Throughput Automated Microbioreactor System for Production of Model IgG1 in CHO Cells

Published on: September 28, 2018

11.5K
Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists
05:22

Author Spotlight: Demonstrating Systematic Endobronchial Ultrasound to New Endoscopists

Published on: August 11, 2023

2.8K
Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication
07:21

Automated Interactive Video Playback for Studies of Animal Communication

Published on: February 9, 2011

14.0K

Area of Science:

  • Information Science
  • Bibliometrics
  • Systematic Review Methodology

Background:

  • Bibliographic aggregators like OpenAlex and Semantic Scholar offer potential for automating citation searching in systematic reviews.
  • Automated methods may increase efficiency in systematic review production.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the performance of automated citation searching against standard strategies.
  • To identify factors influencing the performance of automated citation searching.

Main Methods:

  • Automated citation searching was simulated on 27 systematic reviews across OpenAlex and Semantic Scholar.
  • Performance metrics included recall, precision, and F1-F3 scores, compared to original review search strategies.
  • Factors analyzed included study area, number of articles, seed article characteristics, and API choice.

Main Results:

  • Automated citation searching outperformed standard strategies in precision (p < 0.05) and F1 score (p < 0.05).
  • Recall (p < 0.05) and F3 score (p < 0.05) were not superior to standard strategies.
  • Performance varied by study area, with higher performance in environmental management than social policy.

Conclusions:

  • Automated citation searching is best used as a supplementary strategy when precision is prioritized over recall.
  • Its superior precision and F1 score suggest utility in specific systematic review contexts.
  • Lower recall and F3 scores indicate limitations when comprehensive retrieval is paramount.