Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score for Post-extubation Dysphagia (CRISPED) in Critically Ill

Paulo Sérgio Lucas da Silva1,1,2, Emerson Yukio Kubo3, Marcelo Cunio Machado Fonseca4

  • 1Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Diadema State Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. psls.nat@terra.com.br.

Dysphagia
|February 2, 2026
PubMed

Insights

A new clinical risk score (CRISPED) accurately predicts post-extubation dysphagia in critically ill children using three key variables. This tool aids early identification of high-risk patients for timely speech-language pathology interventions.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
  • Clinical Risk Prediction
  • Swallowing Disorders

Background:

  • Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is a common complication in critically ill children requiring mechanical ventilation.
  • Early identification and intervention for PED are crucial for improving patient outcomes.
  • Existing risk prediction tools for PED in pediatric populations are limited.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a clinical risk score, named CRISPED, for predicting PED in critically ill children.
  • To identify key clinical predictors associated with PED development.
  • To enable accurate risk stratification for timely intervention.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective cohort study in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) including children aged 1 month to 15 years on mechanical ventilation for ≥24 hours.
  • PED defined as Functional Oral Intake Scale < 6 at first post-extubation speech-language pathology (SLP) assessment.
  • LASSO logistic regression used for predictor selection; cohort split into development and validation samples.

Main Results:

  • Overall PED incidence was 65% in 432 patients.
  • Three independent predictors identified: iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome, number of intubations, and intubation duration.
  • The CRISPED score demonstrated strong discrimination (C-statistic 0.85 in development, 0.86 in validation) and accurate risk stratification across low, intermediate, and high-risk categories.

Conclusions:

  • The CRISPED score accurately predicts PED in critically ill children using three readily available clinical variables.
  • It facilitates early identification of high-risk patients, enabling prioritized SLP interventions.
  • External multicenter validation is recommended prior to widespread clinical implementation.

Related Concept Videos

Reliability and Validity01:29

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to consistently produce a given result. In the context of psychological research, this would mean that any instruments or tools used to collect data do so in consistent, reproducible ways.
13.9K
Endotracheal Tube Extubation01:24

Endotracheal Tube Extubation

Endotracheal tube extubation is a critical procedure in weaning patients from mechanical ventilation. It involves physically removing the oral or nasal endotracheal (ET) tube, marking the final step in liberating a patient from ventilatory support.
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....
4.2K
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation01:10

In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation

In vitro dissolution and drug release tests assess how quickly and how much of a drug is released from its dosage form into an aqueous medium under standardized laboratory conditions. These tests are essential tools in pharmaceutical development and quality assurance, offering insight into the drug's performance before clinical use.During formulation development, dissolution testing identifies incomplete or inconsistent drug release issues. It also supports decisions on selecting the optimal...
343
Introduction to z Scores01:06

Introduction to z Scores

A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
11.2K
Introduction to z Scores01:05

Introduction to z Scores

A z score (or standardized value) is measured in units of the standard deviation. It indicates how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a zero z score. It is important to note that the mean of the z scores is zero, and the standard deviation is one.
z scores...
1.3K
z Scores and Area Under the Curve01:17

z Scores and Area Under the Curve

z scores are the standardized values obtained after converting a normal distribution into a standard normal distribution. A z score is measured in units of the standard deviation. The z score tells you how many standard deviations the value x is above (to the right of) or below (to the left of) the mean, μ. Values of x that are larger than the mean have positive z scores, and values of x that are smaller than the mean have negative z scores. If x equals the mean, then x has a z score of...
19.6K