Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

A Structured Approach to Extubation in Mechanically Ventilated Rats
Published on: July 18, 2025
Development and Validation of a Clinical Risk Score for Post-extubation Dysphagia (CRISPED) in Critically Ill
Paulo Sérgio Lucas da Silva1,1,2, Emerson Yukio Kubo3, Marcelo Cunio Machado Fonseca4
1Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Diadema State Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil. psls.nat@terra.com.br.
Insights
A new clinical risk score (CRISPED) accurately predicts post-extubation dysphagia in critically ill children using three key variables. This tool aids early identification of high-risk patients for timely speech-language pathology interventions.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
- Clinical Risk Prediction
- Swallowing Disorders
Background:
- Post-extubation dysphagia (PED) is a common complication in critically ill children requiring mechanical ventilation.
- Early identification and intervention for PED are crucial for improving patient outcomes.
- Existing risk prediction tools for PED in pediatric populations are limited.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and validate a clinical risk score, named CRISPED, for predicting PED in critically ill children.
- To identify key clinical predictors associated with PED development.
- To enable accurate risk stratification for timely intervention.
Main Methods:
- Prospective cohort study in a pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) including children aged 1 month to 15 years on mechanical ventilation for ≥24 hours.
- PED defined as Functional Oral Intake Scale < 6 at first post-extubation speech-language pathology (SLP) assessment.
- LASSO logistic regression used for predictor selection; cohort split into development and validation samples.
Main Results:
- Overall PED incidence was 65% in 432 patients.
- Three independent predictors identified: iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome, number of intubations, and intubation duration.
- The CRISPED score demonstrated strong discrimination (C-statistic 0.85 in development, 0.86 in validation) and accurate risk stratification across low, intermediate, and high-risk categories.
Conclusions:
- The CRISPED score accurately predicts PED in critically ill children using three readily available clinical variables.
- It facilitates early identification of high-risk patients, enabling prioritized SLP interventions.
- External multicenter validation is recommended prior to widespread clinical implementation.
Abstract:
The purpose of this study was to develop and validate a clinical risk score (CRISPED) for predicting post-extubation dysphagia (PED) in critically ill children. We conducted a prospective cohort study in a pediatric intensive care unit of a tertiary hospital (2021-2025). Consecutive children aged 1 month to 15 years requiring invasive mechanical ventilation ≥ 24 h were eligible. PED was defined as Functional Oral Intake Scale < 6 at first post-extubation speech-language pathology (SLP) assessment. The candidate predictors were evaluated using LASSO logistic regression. The cohort was split into development (n = 300) and validation (n = 132) samples for model assessment. Overall, the PED incidence was 65% among 432 patients included in the study. Three independent predictors were retained: iatrogenic withdrawal syndrome, number of intubations, and intubation duration. The CRISPED score demonstrated strong discrimination in the development cohort (C-statistic 0.85, 95% CI 0.80-0.89; accuracy 75%; Brier score 0.14) with good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow p = 0.44). Bootstrap internal validation confirmed minimal optimism with corrected C-statistic 0.84. Performance remained robust in the validation cohort (C-statistic 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.92; accuracy 80%; Brier score 0.15). Risk stratification into low (≤ 13 points), intermediate (14-17), and high (≥ 18) categories showed progressive PED prevalence: 21.8%, 61.5%, and 87.5% (p < 0.001). For severe PED (tube dependent patients), discrimination remained good (C-statistic 0.80; accuracy 75.8%). The CRISPED score provides accurate risk stratification for PED using three readily available clinical variables. It enables early identification of high-risk patients for prioritized SLP interventions, potentially improving clinical outcomes. External multicenter validation is essential before widespread clinical implementation.
Related Concept Videos
Reliability and Validity
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
Introduction to z Scores
z scores...
z Scores and Area Under the Curve

