Validation of the 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis in a Chinese cohort
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Chinese Herbal Retention Enema for the Treatment of Ulcerative Colitis
Published on: May 16, 2025
Yun Liu1, Minglang Zhan2, Sheng-An Chen3,4
1Department of Rheumatology, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China.
Objectives:
To assess the performance of the 2022 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis (EGPA) in a multicenter cohort in Eastern China and compare it against the 1990 ACR and 2017 mepolizumab in relapsing or refractory EGPA (MIRRA) criteria.
Methods:
EGPA patients diagnosed between January 2018 and March 2025 were included in the study, and the diagnosis by "an expert panel" was used as the gold standard. The sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value (PPV, NPV), accuracy and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of three sets of classification criteria (1990 ACR, 2017 MIRRA and 2022 ACR/EULAR) were evaluated.
Results:
A total of 96 EGPA patients and 163 controls including 91 cases of other types of vasculitis and 72 cases of eosinophilic disorders were enrolled. 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria had the highest sensitivity of 87.5% and accuracy of 94.2% compared with 1990 ACR and 2017 MIRRA criteria. However, the specificity (98.2%) was slightly lower than that of the 1990 ACR and 2017 MIRRA criteria in the entire control. Thirty-five patients (36.5%) fulfilled all three criteria. The most sensitive item was eosinophilia (eosinophil ratio > 10% or count ≥ 1 × 109/L), with a sensitivity of 90.6%, followed by eosinophil ratio > 10% (89.6%) and eosinophil count ≥ 1 × 109/L (82.3%). The most specific item was vascular wall eosinophils (98.6%).
Conclusion:
The 2022 ACR/EULAR classification criteria demonstrated significant improvement in sensitivity and accuracy while maintaining a relatively high level of specificity. It is noticing that these criteria should not be used for the diagnosis of EGPA. Key Points • 2022 ACR/EULAR EGPA classification criteria were validated in a cohort of China. • 2022 ACR/EULAR criteria had higher sensitivity and accuracy compared to 1990 ACR criteria and 2017 MIRRA criteria.
More Related Videos
08:53Preparation of Single-cohort Colonies and Hormone Treatment of Worker Honeybees to Analyze Physiology Associated with Role and/or Endocrine System
Published on: September 6, 2016
06:05Enema of Traditional Chinese Medicine for Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis
Published on: January 27, 2023
Related Concept Videos
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - II
Criteria for Causality: Bradford Hill Criteria - I
Reliability and Validity
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Data Validation
Nursing assessment guides are generally based on holistic models rather than medical...
Force Classification
Contact and non-contact forces are two of the most widely used categories of forces. As the name suggests, contact forces require physical contact between two objects to act upon each other. Examples of contact forces include frictional,...