Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Determination of Mammalian Cell Counts, Cell Size and Cell Health Using the Moxi Z Mini Automated Cell Counter
Published on: June 21, 2012
A Comparative Approach for Quantitative Cell Counting Studies in Widely Different Mammalian Brains
Alessia Pattaro1, Alessandro Zanone2, Chet C Sherwood3
1Neuroscience Institute Cavalieri Ottolenghi; Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Turin.
Abstract:
Most neurobiological studies are conducted on laboratory rodents. Despite many similarities across mammalian brains, important differences also exist, which can be misleading in translation. Marked interspecies differences have been found in brain plasticity, particularly neurogenesis. Different neurogenic processes can be prevalent because of evolutionary tradeoffs, displaying variation across brain structures and mammals and shifting the potential for plasticity in divergent species, such as mice and humans. Comparing widely different species raises multiple issues: comparative studies encounter technical difficulties when large-sized brains are involved; the use of heterogeneous experimental approaches by different laboratories can limit the comparison of results; heterogeneity may be related to different time courses of neurodevelopmental processes across mammals, thus adding variables to the comparison. To tackle these limitations, an approach to study the interspecies variation of a population of layer II cortical immature neurons in mammals widely differing for brain size, gyrencephaly, socioecological niche, and age was established. Despite some variables that cannot be fully standardized, a method that combines reduced heterogeneity in collecting brains and the establishment of common anatomical structures as reference points for performing the cell counting on corresponding brain levels is proposed. Data obtained (e.g., cell densities) can be mapped onto phylogenetic trees to reveal evolutionary patterns and analyzed for covariance with neuroanatomical features (e.g., brain size, cortical surface area). This approach has demonstrated remarkable variation in the number of cortical immature neurons between phylogenetic groups and uncovered covariation with brain size. The method can also be used to quantify differences through different developmental stages in the same species and can be extended to other diverse mammals and biological processes to map comparable results that allow for more accurate quantification of different cell populations in adult brains to support plasticity.
More Related Videos
10:22Mammalian Cell Division in 3D Matrices via Quantitative Confocal Reflection Microscopy
Published on: November 29, 2017
08:04A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 13, 2014
Related Concept Videos
Comparative Excretory Systems
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Case Studies
Comparing Mitochondrial, Chloroplast, and Prokaryotic Genomes
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test