Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 4, 2026

Pressure Controlled Ventilation to Induce Acute Lung Injury in Mice
Published on: May 5, 2011
Adaptive support ventilation with IntelliSync versus pressure support ventilation for non-invasive ventilation in
Selva Vijay1, Inderpaul Singh Sehgal1, Ritesh Agarwal1
1Department of Pulmonary Medicine, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India.
Background:
While non-invasive ventilation (NIV) is recommended for managing acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD), it has a 30-40% failure rate when delivered using pressure support ventilation (PSV). Adaptive support ventilation with IntelliSync (ASVi) synchronizes breath initiation and cycling to match patient's requirements. We conducted a feasibility study to inform design of a larger trial and compared NIV failure rates using PSV or ASVi in patients with AECOPD.
Materials And Methods:
We conducted a single-center, randomized controlled trial from December 2023 to April 2025 in subjects with AECOPD. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive NIV using PSV or ASVi. The primary outcome was NIV failure, defined as the need for airway intubation. Key secondary outcomes included the asynchrony index and 28-day all-cause mortality.
Results:
We included 55 consecutive subjects with AECOPD (ASVi, n = 26; PSV, n = 29), with a mean age of 63 years. NIV failure occurred in15.4% (4/26) with ASVi versus 31% (9/29) with PSV, representing a 50% relative risk reduction (absolute difference 15.6%, 95% CI: -6.2%-37.5%, P = 0.17). Asynchrony index was similar between groups (22.6 ± 17.8 ASVi vs. 21.5 ± 16.7 PSV, P = 0.83). ASVi was associated with significantly greater patient comfort (P = 0.048) and shorter hospital stay (3.9 ± 2.9 vs 5.8 ± 4.0 days, P = 0.021).
Conclusion:
This study demonstrates that ASVi is safe, feasible to implement, and associated with improved patient comfort and significantly reduced hospital stay in AECOPD. The observed 50% relative reduction in NIV failure rates, although not statistically significant, represents a clinically meaningful effect that warrants evaluation in a larger trial.
More Related Videos
09:31Normothermic Negative Pressure Ventilation Ex Situ Lung Perfusion: Evaluation of Lung Function and Metabolism
Published on: February 14, 2022
06:22Surfactant Depletion Combined with Injurious Ventilation Results in a Reproducible Model of the Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome ARDS
Published on: April 7, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Mechanical Ventilation II: Invasive Ventilation
Negative-Pressure Ventilators
Negative-pressure ventilators create a vacuum around the chest or body to draw air into the lungs, simulating breathing. This method does not require an...
Mechanical Ventilation III: Noninvasive Ventilation
Noninvasive Positive-Pressure Ventilation...
Factors Affecting Pulmonary Ventilation
Alveolar Surface Tension
The alveolar fluid lines the luminal surface of the alveoli and exerts a force called surface tension. This force is caused by the polar water molecules in the liquid being more strongly attracted to each...
Pulmonary Ventilation: Inhalation
Boyle's law becomes particularly pertinent when examining respiratory...
Assessment of Ventilation I: Respiratory Rate
A Ventilation assessment is critical for monitoring a patient's health status. Respiration, one of the most accessible vital signs, provides insights into the function of numerous body systems and can indicate serious health issues, such as brainstem injuries from head trauma.
Critical Guidelines for Assessing Ventilation:
Mechanical Ventilation I: Indication and Settings