Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

High-Throughput Dissociation and Orthotopic Implantation of Breast Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: December 20, 2024
Outcomes of Anastrozole, Letrozole, and Exemestane in Patients With Postmenopausal Breast Cancer
Elise Dumas1,2, Anne-Sophie Hamy2,3, Kerollos Nashat Wanis4
1Institute of Mathematics, École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Importance:
Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs)-anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane-are standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for women with postmenopausal hormone receptor (HR)-positive early-stage breast cancer. However, little is known about their comparative effectiveness in clinical settings.
Objective:
To compare adjuvant anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane in terms of disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in women with postmenopausal HR-positive early-stage breast cancer.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
This comparative effectiveness study conducted in France emulated a target trial using national medicoadministrative data. The patient cohort was derived from the updated French Early Breast Cancer Cohort and consisted of women aged 50 to 75 years with early-stage breast cancer who were diagnosed between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2020, and followed up through December 31, 2021. All women initiated adjuvant AI therapy without ovarian suppression. Data analysis was performed from November 2024 to May 2025.
Exposures:
Upfront adjuvant anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, evaluated under natural persistence and under a hypothetical intervention ensuring perfect persistence for 5 years.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
The primary end points were DFS and OS. Both DFS and OS were estimated using adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves.
Results:
Among 148 436 women (median [IQR] age, 64 [59-69] years) included in the analyses, 38.5% initiated anastrozole, 52.9% initiated letrozole, and 8.5% initiated exemestane. After a median (IQR) follow-up of 63 (34-94) months, the 8-year DFS under natural persistence was estimated to be lower for the exemestane group (79.1%; 95% CI, 78.1%-80.0%) compared with the anastrozole (81.0%; 95% CI, 80.6%-81.5%) and letrozole (81.1%; 95% CI, 80.7%-81.5%) groups. Similarly, the 8-year OS was 88.8% (95% CI, 88.0%-89.6%) for the exemestane group compared with 90.5% (95% CI, 90.2%-90.8%) for the anastrozole group and 89.9% (95% CI, 89.6%-90.2%) for the letrozole group. Patients who initiated exemestane were also more likely to discontinue treatment within 5 years of therapy than their counterparts taking the other AIs (39.3% [95% CI, 38.3%-40.3%] in the exemestane group vs 35.1% [95% CI, 34.7%-35.6%] in the anastrozole group and 35.0% [95% CI, 34.6%-35.4%] in the letrozole group). However, the lower DFS and OS observed for exemestane compared with letrozole and anastrozole persisted under perfect persistence.
Conclusions And Relevance:
The findings of this comparative effectiveness study using a target trial emulation framework suggest that adjuvant endocrine therapy with exemestane may result in slightly lower DFS and OS compared with anastrozole and letrozole in patients with postmenopausal HR-positive early-stage breast cancer. The findings favor anastrozole or letrozole as initial treatment and highlight the need for future studies to inform AI selection.
Insights
Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs) like exemestane may lead to slightly lower disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to anastrozole or letrozole for postmenopausal breast cancer patients. Anastrozole or letrozole are favored for initial treatment.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Endocrinology
- Comparative Effectiveness Research
Background:
- Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (AIs), including anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane, are standard adjuvant endocrine therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early-stage breast cancer.
- Comparative effectiveness of these AIs in real-world clinical settings is not well-established.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of adjuvant anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane.
- To evaluate disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in postmenopausal women with HR-positive early-stage breast cancer receiving these AIs.
Main Methods:
- A comparative effectiveness study emulating a target trial using French national medico-administrative data.
- Cohort included women aged 50-75 years with early-stage breast cancer initiating adjuvant AI therapy without ovarian suppression between 2011-2020.
- Primary endpoints (DFS and OS) were estimated using adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves under natural and perfect persistence scenarios.
Main Results:
- Among 148,436 women, 8-year DFS was lower for exemestane (79.1%) compared to anastrozole (81.0%) and letrozole (81.1%).
- 8-year OS was also lower for exemestane (88.8%) versus anastrozole (90.5%) and letrozole (89.9%).
- Exemestane users were more likely to discontinue treatment within 5 years; lower DFS and OS for exemestane persisted even under perfect persistence.
Conclusions:
- Adjuvant exemestane may be associated with slightly lower DFS and OS compared to anastrozole and letrozole in postmenopausal HR-positive early-stage breast cancer.
- Findings suggest favoring anastrozole or letrozole for initial treatment.
- Further research is needed to guide optimal AI selection.
Related Concept Videos
Predicting Reaction Outcomes
Outcomes of Glycolysis
Cellular respiration can occur aerobically (with oxygen) or anaerobically (without oxygen). In the presence of oxygen, cellular respiration starts with glycolysis and continues with pyruvate...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Cancer
Patient-centered Care
What is Cancer?
Although people have known about cancer for centuries, it was only in 1761 that Giovanni Morgagni of Padua performed a detailed autopsy of...

