Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

A Two-Step Method for Percutaneous Transhepatic Choledochoscopic Lithotomy
Published on: September 13, 2022
Reassessing the timing of percutaneous gastrostomy tube placement: Too many too soon
Anna Tatakis1, Danielle Wilson, Hannah Holland
1From the Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Insights
Most patients resume oral intake after percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube placement. However, many PEGs are placed for disposition, leading to complications. Consider delaying PEG placement to reduce risks.
Area of Science:
- Medical procedures
- Gastroenterology
- Patient outcomes
Background:
- Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are crucial for long-term feeding access.
- PEG placement is often utilized to facilitate hospital discharge planning.
- Understanding the risk-benefit of PEG placement is essential due to procedural risks and patient recovery potential.
Purpose of the Study:
- Investigate the rate of return to oral intake post-PEG placement.
- Determine the primary indications for PEG procedures.
- Analyze the complication rates associated with PEG placement to assess the risk-benefit balance.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of nonelective PEG tube placements from January 2023 to March 2024.
- Collected data on patient demographics, procedure details, time to oral intake resumption, and outcomes.
- Primary outcome: return to oral intake at discharge; Secondary outcomes: placement for disposition, complication rate; 1-year follow-up.
Main Results:
- 59.7% of patients resumed oral intake by discharge; 18.7% achieved normal feeding.
- 37.3% of PEGs were placed for hospital disposition.
- Overall complication rate was 24.5%, with 46% being Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher.
Conclusions:
- The majority of patients resume oral intake before discharge after nonelective PEG placement.
- Over one-third of PEG placements were for disposition, and nearly half of complications required intervention.
- Delaying PEG placement may decrease unnecessary procedures and associated complications.
Background:
Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are used for patients requiring long-term feeding access but are often placed to facilitate hospital disposition. Given the associated procedural risks and potential for patient recovery, we aimed to investigate the rate of return to oral intake after PEG placement, procedural indications, and complications to better elucidate the risk-benefit balance of PEG placement.
Methods:
We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who underwent nonelective PEG tube placement at our Level 1 trauma center from January 1, 2023, to March 1, 2024. Patient demographics, procedure details, time to resumption of oral intake, and outcome data were collected. Primary outcome was return to oral intake at discharge. Secondary outcomes included placement for disposition purposes and complication rate. Patients were followed for 1 year after discharge.
Results:
Of 233 patients identified, 59.7% resumed oral intake by time of discharge, 18.7% of which had returned to normal feeding. The median time to discharge from PEG placement was 11 days (interquartile range, 3-30 days). Furthermore, 37.3% of PEGs were placed for hospital disposition. The overall complication rate was 24.5% (46% Clavien-Dindo grade 3 or higher). Patients who had a PEG placed for disposition resumed an oral diet at a median of 5.5 days versus 17.5 days in those not done for disposition ( p < 0.01). There were similar overall complication rates but a significantly higher proportion of Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3 complications ( p = 0.02) in the PEG placed for disposition group. Overall, 19.7% of PEGs were placed in patients who were nutritionally independent by discharge, experienced in-hospital mortality, or were discharged to hospice.
Conclusion:
Most patients who received a nonelective PEG resumed oral intake prior to discharge. Over one third of procedures were done to facilitate patient disposition, and nearly half of all complications required procedural intervention. Delaying PEG placement until closer to discharge may reduce unnecessary procedures and the associated complications.
Level Of Evidence:
Therapeutic/Care Management; Level IV.
Related Concept Videos
Enteral Nutrition II: Nasointestinal and Gastrostomy Feeding
Nasointestinal Feeding
Nasointestinal feeding involves placing a tube...
Uterine Tubes
Endotracheal Tube Extubation
Procedure
Extubation removes the endotracheal tube (ETT) from the patient on mechanical ventilation. It requires a well-coordinated, multidisciplinary approach involving physicians, nurses, respiratory therapists, and other healthcare professionals....
Tracheostomy: Procedure and Tubes
Tracheostomy tubes can be made of semiflexible plastic (polyurethane or silicone), rigid plastic, or metal, and they come in...
Rise of Liquid in a Capillary Tube
Steady, Laminar Flow in Circular Tubes

