Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Assessment of Myofilament Ca2+ Sensitivity Underlying Cardiac Excitation-contraction Coupling
Published on: August 1, 2016
Efficient Implementation of the Spin-Free Renormalized Internally-Contracted Multireference Coupled Cluster Theory
Kalman Szenes1, Riya Kayal2, Kantharuban Sivalingam2
1ETH Zürich, Department of Chemistry and Applied Biosciences, Vladimir-Prelog-Weg 2 8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
None:
In this paper, an efficient implementation of the renormalized internally contracted multireference coupled cluster with singles and doubles (RIC-MRCCSD) into the ORCA quantum chemistry program suite is reported. To this end, Evangelista's Wick&d equation generator was combined with ORCA's native AGE code generator in order to implement the many-body residuals required for the RIC-MRCCSD method. Substantial efficiency gains are realized by deriving a spin-free formulation instead of the previously reported spin-orbital version developed by some of us. Since AGE produces parallelized code, the resulting implementation can directly be run in parallel with substantial speedups when executed on multiple cores. In terms of runtime, the cost of RIC-MRCCSD is shown to be between single-reference RHF-CCSD and UHF-CCSD, even when active space spaces as large as CAS(14,14) are considered. This achievement is largely due to the fact that no reduced density matrices or cumulants higher than three-body enter the formalism. The scalability of the method to large systems is furthermore demonstrated by computing the ground-state of a vitamin B12 model comprised of an active space of CAS(12,12) and 809 orbitals. In terms of accuracy, RIC-MRCCSD is carefully compared to second- and approximate fourth-order n-electron valence state perturbation theories (NEVPT2, NEVPT4(SD)), to the multireference zeroth-order coupled-electron pair approximation (CEPA(0)), as well as to the IC-MRCCSD from Köhn. In contrast to RIC-MRCCSD, the IC-MRCCSD equations are entirely derived by AGE using the conventional projection-based approach, which, however, leads to much higher algorithmic complexity than the former as well as the necessity to calculate up to the five-body RDMs. Remaining challenges such as the variation of the results with the flow, a free parameter that enters the RIC-MRCCSD theory, are discussed.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
Excitation-Contraction Coupling in Skeletal Muscles
When an action...

