Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Design of a Biocompatible Drug-Eluting Tracheal Stent in Mice with Laryngotracheal Stenosis
Published on: January 21, 2020
Drug-coated balloons versus stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis: a meta-analysis
Pablo Andrés Vega-Medina1, Jorge Eduardo Alonso Vera2,3, Laura Alexandra González-Chang1
1School of Medicine, University of Panama, Panama City, Panama.
Insights
Drug-coated balloons (DCB/DEBs) show lower restenosis and recurrent stroke risk than stenting for intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS). This endovascular approach may be safer, though long-term data are pending.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Interventional Cardiology
- Vascular Surgery
Background:
- Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a major cause of ischemic stroke.
- Stent angioplasty is a common treatment but carries risks like restenosis and thromboembolism.
- Drug-coated balloons/drug-eluting balloons (DCB/DEBs) offer an alternative without permanent implants.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare clinical and procedural outcomes of DCB/DEBs versus stent angioplasty in patients with symptomatic ICAS.
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of DCB/DEBs as an endovascular treatment for ICAS.
Main Methods:
- Systematic review and meta-analysis adhering to PRISMA guidelines.
- Inclusion of six studies with 527 patients (233 DCB/DEB, 294 stenting).
- Assessment of restenosis rates, periprocedural complications, and recurrent ischemic events.
Main Results:
- DCB/DEBs significantly reduced restenosis risk (RR 0.25) compared to stenting.
- No significant difference in periprocedural complications between DCB/DEBs and stenting (RR 0.65).
- DCB/DEBs were associated with significantly fewer recurrent ischemic events (RR 0.30).
Conclusions:
- DCB/DEBs demonstrate superior outcomes regarding restenosis and recurrent ischemic events for symptomatic ICAS.
- This approach appears to be a potentially safer endovascular option than stenting, without increased periprocedural risks.
- Further randomized trials are needed to establish long-term efficacy and definitive clinical practice guidelines.
Background:
Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is a leading cause of ischemic stroke, often requiring endovascular treatment in cases refractory to medical therapy. Stent angioplasty is the most common intervention, but it carries risks such as restenosis and thromboembolic events. Drug-coated balloons or drug-eluting balloons (DCB/DEBs) have emerged as a promising alternative, delivering antiproliferative agents without permanent implantation. This study aims to compare clinical and procedural outcomes of DCB/DEBs versus stent angioplasty in patients with symptomatic ICAS.
Methods:
A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42024616346). Six studies comprising 527 patients (233 DCB/DEB, 294 stenting) were included. Outcomes assessed included restenosis rates, periprocedural complications, and recurrent ischemic events.
Results:
DCB/DEBs significantly reduced the risk of restenosis (RR 0.25; 95% CI 0.15 to 0.40; I²=0%) compared with stents. For periprocedural complications, no significant difference was observed (RR 0.65; 95% CI 0.32 to 1.33; I²=0%). In terms of recurrent ischemic events, DCB/DEBs were associated with a significant reduction (RR 0.30; 95% CI 0.13 to 0.67; I²=0%).
Conclusion:
DCB/DEBs appear to offer significantly lower restenosis rates and fewer recurrent ischemic events compared with conventional stenting for symptomatic ICAS, without increasing periprocedural complications. While data on long-term outcomes remain limited, DCB/DEBs may represent a less invasive and potentially safer endovascular option. Further randomized trials are warranted to define its role in clinical practice.
Related Concept Videos
Directing Effect of Substituents: meta-Directing Groups
Mitral Stenosis I: Introduction
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Drug Analysis Methods
Pinching-off of Coated Vesicles
Clathrin Coated Vesicles
COP Coated Vesicles

