Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Author Spotlight: Addressing Technical and Subjective Challenges in Measuring Classroom Attention
Published on: December 15, 2023
Development and validation of an artificial intelligence-based model for diagnosing benign, borderline, and malignant
Yingnan Wu1,2,3, Wenli Dai3,4, Xiaoying Li1
1Cancer Centre, Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital (Affiliated People's Hospital), Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
None:
Classification of benign, borderline, and malignant adnexal masses is critical to effective clinical management, but remains a challenge. We developed Clinical-Ovarian Multi-Task Attention (Clinical-OMTA), an artificial intelligence model based on a dual-backbone architecture (benign vs. non-benign, and borderline vs. malignant) that integrates ultrasound, age, and Carbohydrate Antigen 125 (CA125) for multi-class classification. The model's performance, generalisability, and clinical utility were evaluated. Retrospective data were collected from 23 hospitals (1882 patients for training, validation, and internal testing from 21 hospitals; 340 and 159 patients for external testing from two hospitals). In the external image dataset, Clinical-OMTA demonstrated comparable diagnostic performance to ADNEX (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.950 vs. 0.953, 0.870 vs. 0.853, 0.930 vs. 0.938) and subjective assessment by an expert examiner (accuracy: 85.6% vs. 87.4%). While Clinical-OMTA supported multimodal integration, it did not outperform Ovarian Multi-Task Attention (OMTA) that trained only with images, indicating that including age and CA125 did not improve performance. Clinical-OMTA performed similarly across acquisition modes, equipment types, scanning methods, and different centres (accuracy: 79.9%-87.7%). With Clinical-OMTA as a decision support tool, radiologists showed significantly improved inter-reader agreement (kappa: 0.17-0.78 vs. 0.86-0.98) and diagnostic accuracy (72.3% vs. 88.0%). Clinical-OMTA appears generalisable and could be especially useful in low-resource or remote settings where expert ultrasound examiners are scarce.
More Related Videos
05:33Introduction of an Integrated Pathology Image Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Reporting System
Published on: July 11, 2025
08:57Author Spotlight: Genetically Engineered Mouse Models and Pathological Characterization of Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Associated Tumors
Published on: May 17, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Borderline Personality Disorder
Genetic and Environmental Contributions
Borderline Personality...
Reliability and Validity
In Vitro Drug Release Testing: Overview, Development and Validation
Diagnosing Acidosis and Alkalosis
First, the pH level is assessed to determine whether the blood pH is normal (7.35–7.45), low (acidosis), or high (alkalosis).
Next, the PCO2 and...
Intelligence
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...