Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Electrically Evoked Stapedius Reflex Measurements in Cochlear Implantation and Its Application in the Postoperative Fitting Process
Published on: June 21, 2024
The Risk of Becoming a Cochlear Implant Non-user or Minimal-user in a Patient Cohort From Denmark 2010-2022
Martin Abou-Taha1, Thomas Hudlebusch Meldgaard1, Jesper Hvass Schmidt2
1Department of ORL-Head & Neck Surgery and Audiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense C, Denmark.
Objective:
Cochlear implant (CI) non-use and minimal-use are important, but sparsely investigated parameters. This study investigates the risk of becoming a CI non-user or a minimal-user in a post-lingual deafness adult population.
Study Design:
Retrospective cohort study.
Setting:
Tertiary medical institution.
Materials And Methods:
All adult patients (18 years or above) who received CI surgery at a single center from 2010 to 2022 (n=599) were invited to participate in a questionnaire study concerning the CI usage after surgery. The questionnaire information was combined with data from medical records. Non-use was defined as never/rarely usage of the device. Minimal-users were patients who reported <4 hours of daily use, and patients considering ceasing to use their device, and not included in the non-use group.
Results:
In total, 472 (78.8%) patients replied to the questionnaire regarding CI usage. Hereof, 20 patients (4.2%) were non-users and 26 patients (5.5%) were minimal-users with mean follow-up times of 8.4±3.4 years. Rehabilitation was provided for 97% of the participants by a speech-language pathologist for 6 to 12 months. Abnormal cochlear anatomy was associated with CI non-use (odds ratio=5.7, 95% confidence interval [1.1-30.8], P =0.04). No additional correlations were found between non-users, minimal-users, and CI users.
Conclusion:
The CI non-user rate was 4.2% and these patients experienced lower QoL compared with CI users. In addition, 5.5% of the patients were minimal-users. In adults with abnormal cochlear anatomy, an increased risk of non-use was identified, reflecting the need for thorough information regarding surgical outcomes in this specific subgroup of patients.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Types of Errors: Detection and Minimization
Absolute error in a measurement is the numerical difference from the true or central value. Relative error is the ratio between absolute error and the true or central value, expressed as a percentage.
Errors can be classified by source, magnitude, and sign. There are three types of errors: systematic, random, and gross.
Systematic or...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Patient-centered Care
Drug Dosing: Geriatric Patients

