Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 5, 2026

Measuring Sensitivity to Viewpoint Change with and without Stereoscopic Cues
Published on: December 4, 2013
Syntactic change in diachrony versus contact-induced change: two sides of the same coin?
Roberta D'Alessandro1, Michael T Putnam2,3, Silvia Terenghi1
1Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands.
Abstract:
Recent studies (e.g. Kupisch, Tanja & Maria Polinsky. 2022. Language history on fast forward: Innovations in heritage languages and diachronic change. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 25. 1-12) have rekindled an old debate concerning whether language change in contact (CIC) and language change in diachrony (CID) proceed along the same developmental path, or whether they diverge from one another in fundamental and predictable ways. This paper contributes to this ongoing debate; we propose a new heuristic to determine similarities and differences in syntactic change in CIC and CID. We postulate that the primary distinction boils down to the type of features related to the domain of syntax under investigation, i.e., situations involving (formal) ϕ-features lead to similar trajectories of change in both CIC and CID, while those driven by discourse-features show divergence. We test our hypothesis on a host of different empirical data, e.g., indexicals, (subject) clitics, and differential object marking (DOM) as evidence for our claim.
Related Concept Videos
Global Climate Change
Rates of Change
Work Done During Volume Change
Consider a gas confined to a cylinder fitted with a movable piston at one end. If the gas expands from volume V1 to volume V2, it exerts a force on the piston, such that the piston moves by a distance dr.
The work done by the gas on the piston can be expressed as
Le Chatelier's Principle: Changing Temperature
To understand this phenomenon, consider the elementary reaction:
Standard Entropy Change for a Reaction
Unsoundness of Aggregate due to Volume Change

