Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Computer-Aided Three-Dimensional Visualization in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Thyroid Cancer
Published on: June 9, 2023
Comparison of Different Maintenance Treatment Options for Newly Diagnosed BRCAwt Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A
Xi Chen1, Chenyan Fang1, Yanglong Guo1
1Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (Zhejiang Cancer Hospital), Hangzhou, China.
Abstract:
IntroductionNiraparib and bevacizumab are two principal maintenance therapies for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) patients with BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) status, regardless of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD). In China, however, a considerable proportion of BRCAwt patients have unknown or untested HRD status, complicating treatment selection.MethodsTo evaluate and compare the efficacy of niraparib and bevacizumab as maintenance therapy for BRCAwt AOC, we conducted a retrospective cohort study using real-world clinical data. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize clinical and demographic characteristics. Progression-free survival (PFS) was estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using a stratified Cox proportional hazards model. A multivariable Cox regression was performed to adjust for potential confounding variables. Exploratory subgroup analyses were conducted, and propensity score matching (PSM) was applied as a sensitivity analysis.ResultsA total of 94 patients were included, with 51 receiving niraparib and 43 receiving bevacizumab. The median PFS was not reached in the niraparib group versus 13.77 months (95% CI, 4.12-23.41) in the bevacizumab group (HR = 0.240, 95% CI, 0.128-0.451; P < .001). After covariate adjustment, the median PFS was 19.55 months (95% CI, 9.40-NA) with niraparib and 8.64 months (95% CI, 4.53-NA) with bevacizumab, with an adjusted HR of 0.282 (95% CI, 0.136-0.587; P = .001). In the PSM sensitivity analysis, the median PFS was not reached (95% CI, 19.55-NR) in the niraparib group and was 18.33 months (95% CI, 8.90-25.26) in the bevacizumab group (HR = 0.360, 95% CI, 0.176-0.736; P = .005).ConclusionThis analysis suggests that niraparib may provide a progression-free survival advantage compared with bevacizumab in BRCAwt AOC patients, with both regimens appearing to be generally well tolerated in the real-world setting. These findings offer preliminary reference value for maintenance treatment selection in patients with newly diagnosed BRCAwt AOC.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Stem Cells and Tumor Maintenance
Cancer stem cells are thought to originate from tissue-specific normal stem cells or progenitor cells. The normal stem cells usually reside in...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Sample Preparation for Analysis: Advanced Techniques
Acid digestion with strong acids is commonly used to dissolve inorganic materials that are insoluble (do not dissolve) in water. This method can be useful for...
Diagnosing Acidosis and Alkalosis
First, the pH level is assessed to determine whether the blood pH is normal (7.35–7.45), low (acidosis), or high (alkalosis).
Next, the PCO2 and...
Cancer Survival Analysis
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

