Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Author Spotlight: Establishment and Confirmation of a Postnatal Right Ventricular Volume Overload Mouse Model
Published on: June 9, 2023
Investigating the Acceptability of Cervical Screening and Self-Sampling in Postnatal Women at the 6-Week Postnatal
Rebecca Newhouse1,2, Lorna McWilliams3, Holly Baker-Rand4
1Department of Gynaecological Oncology, GRACE Centre, Musgrove Park Hospital, Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, UK.
Introduction:
There is a lack of evidence to support UK and international clinical recommendations to delay cervical screening to 12-weeks postnatal. In previous studies, half of women were out of date for screening by the end of pregnancy and the majority would be more likely to take up cervical screening, if offered at the 6-week postnatal check-up. We explored views about postnatal cervical screening the acceptability of offering cervical screening, using conventional and urine self-sampling, earlier within the postnatal period.
Methods:
A cross-sectional qualitative design was used with recruitment from a larger questionnaire-based study. Twenty-six online semi-structured interviews were conducted with 26 pregnant or recently pregnant participants. Interviews were transcribed and pseudonymised. A topic guide was developed, and data analysed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis.
Results:
Three themes were generated from qualitative analysis of verbatim interview transcripts: 1) A window of opportunity; 2) Am I ready yet? Postpartum recovery; and 3) Neglect of women's health in and around pregnancy. Overall, there was a perception that women's health was not a priority in the postnatal period compared with their babies.
Conclusion:
This is the first study to use qualitative interview methods to explore women's views about the offer of cervical screening alongside the postnatal check-up. Results support the feasibility of a clinical trial to test the accuracy and effect on uptake of offering cervical screening at the postnatal check-up, although recognised it might be too soon for some. This should be considered in future feasibility research that includes assessment of concurrent acceptability.
Patient Or Public Contribution:
This study was performed following focus groups in a quality improvement project, designed to increase uptake of cervical screening in women and people who were pregnant or recently pregnant. The suggestion for combining cervical screening with the routine 6-week postnatal follow up was an idea generated by new parents and GP practice staff. The Somerset Maternity Voices group provided feedback on study materials, including the consent form and posters. The semi-structured interview topic guide was designed following free-text comments in the pre-PINCS web-based survey, results of which are published separately. Female pregnant and recently pregnant people, regardless of current gender identity, were included in this study. In line with the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists language guide, we will use 'women' to describe participants.
Clinical Trial Registration:
Trial was registered with the National Institute for Health and Care Research Central Portfolio Management System (CPMS ID: 55489) and https://bepartofresearch.nihr.ac.uk/.
Related Concept Videos
Qualitative Analysis
For instance, group IV...
Qualitative Analysis
There are two main approaches to qualitative analysis:...
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
Protein Folding Quality Check in the RER
Case Studies
Sampling Methods: Sample Types
Solid samples include a variety of substances, such as sediments from water bodies, soil, metals, and biological tissues. Two standard methods for extracting sediments from water bodies are grab sampling and piston coring. Grab sampling involves using a device to collect a discrete sediment sample from the bottom of a water body with minimal disturbance. Grab samples do not always represent the entire area due to...

