Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 6, 2026

Quantifying Learning in Young Infants: Tracking Leg Actions During a Discovery-learning Task
Published on: June 1, 2015
Neural and behavioural differences in multisensory statistical and reinforcement learning across development and task
Nina Raduner1,2,3,4,5, Carmen Providoli1,2,4,5, Sarah V Di Pietro1,2
1URPP Adaptive Brain Circuits in Development and Learning (AdaBD), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Adults show more advanced multisensory learning than children, particularly in detecting statistical regularities. This study reveals developmental differences in reinforcement and statistical learning processes.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Developmental Psychology
- Cognitive Science
Background:
- Multisensory processing and integration are crucial for development, relying on pattern detection and feedback-based behavioral adjustments.
- The precise developmental trajectories of these multisensory learning mechanisms remain incompletely understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate neural and behavioral differences in multisensory statistical and reinforcement learning between adults and children.
- To examine these learning processes across varying task difficulties in children.
Main Methods:
- Utilized discriminative choice and match recognition tasks with audio-visual or tactile-visual stimuli and embedded statistical regularities.
- Compared learning in 28 adults (19.0-30.9 years) and two groups of children (N=28 and N=29, 8.5-12.8 years).
- Employed computational modeling and neuroimaging (fMRI) to analyze behavioral and neural data.
Main Results:
- All groups showed improved accuracy and faster reaction times over time; adults outperformed children, and audio-visual learning surpassed tactile-visual.
- Adults exhibited more sophisticated learning strategies, higher sensitivity to value differences, and more deterministic choices.
- Statistical surprise modulated specific brain regions (lateral prefrontal cortex, intraparietal sulcus, anterior cingulate cortex), while reward prediction errors engaged other areas (striatum, medial frontal, hippocampus).
- Reward prediction errors were consistent across groups and tasks, but neural processing of statistical surprise showed developmental differences, suggesting immaturity in children's statistical regularity detection.
Conclusions:
- Task design significantly influences the comparison of learning differences across developmental groups.
- Reinforcement learning and statistical learning can be studied concurrently, revealing distinct developmental patterns in their neural underpinnings.
- Children demonstrate less mature abilities in detecting statistical regularities compared to adults, highlighting developmental changes in multisensory learning.
Related Concept Videos
Identifying Statistically Significant Differences: The F-Test
Statistical Significance
Histone Variants at the Centromere
Reinforcement
Positive reinforcement occurs when a behavior is followed by the presentation of a rewarding stimulus, increasing the frequency of that behavior. For example:
Corrosion of Reinforcement
However, over time and under certain conditions like carbonation, chloride ingress, and cracking this protective state can be compromised. Steel has areas with...
Reinforcement Schedules
Once a behavior is learned,...

