Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Classification and Identification01:28

Methods of Classification and Identification

1.2K
Bacterial identification relies on a diverse array of techniques to classify and understand microorganisms, each tailored to uncover specific characteristics. Traditional morphological approaches, while still valuable, are limited for closely related or structurally simple organisms. Modern methods integrate biochemical, serological, genetic, and advanced molecular tools to achieve greater accuracy.Morphological and Biochemical TechniquesMorphological characteristics, such as cell shape and...
1.2K
Area Computation by the Alternative Coordinate Method01:24

Area Computation by the Alternative Coordinate Method

645
The alternative coordinate method, also known as the Shoelace Formula, is a technique for determining the area of a traverse using Cartesian coordinates. This method relies on the sequential arrangement of x and y coordinates for each point of the shape, ensuring accuracy and ease of application.In this approach, each corner's x and y coordinates are listed as fractions, with the x-coordinate as the numerator and the y-coordinate as the denominator. These coordinates are arranged sequentially...
645
Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion01:26

Pharmacokinetic Models: Comparison and Selection Criterion

363
Physiological and compartmental models are valuable tools used in studying biological systems. These models rely on differential equations to maintain mass balance within the system, ensuring an accurate representation of the dynamic processes at play.
Physiological models take a detailed approach by considering specific molecular processes. They can predict drug distribution, metabolism, and elimination changes, providing a comprehensive understanding of how drugs interact with the body.
363
Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods01:08

Renal Drug Clearance: Comparison Between Renal Excretion Methods

618
Renal clearance is a critical parameter encompassing kidney filtration, secretion, and reabsorption processes. It is calculated using a specific equation to determine the rate at which the kidneys clear a drug.
Renal clearance is often associated with the renal glomerular filtration rate (GFR), which represents the rate at which plasma is filtered through the glomeruli in the kidney. When drug reabsorption is minimal and there is no active secretion, renal clearance is closely related to the...
618
The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison02:57

The Sense of Self: Reflected Self-Appraisal and Social Comparison

56.1K
According to Charles Cooley, we base our image on what we think other people see (Cooley 1902). We imagine how we must appear to others, then react to this speculation. We don certain clothes, prepare our hair in a particular manner, wear makeup, use cologne, and the like—all with the notion that our presentation of ourselves is going to affect how others perceive us. We expect a certain reaction, and, if lucky, we get the one we desire and feel good about it. But more than that, Cooley...
56.1K
Multiple Comparison Tests01:13

Multiple Comparison Tests

4.5K
Multiple comparison test, abbreviated as MCT, is a post hoc analysis generally performed after comparing multiple samples with one or more tests. An MCT will help identify a significantly different sample among multiple samples or a factor among multiple factors.
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
4.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Computational Modelling of Selective Capture Mechanisms in Conduction System Pacing.

Annals of biomedical engineering·2026
Same author

AutoVARP - A framework for automated reproducible inducibility testing in computational models of cardiac electrophysiology.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2026
Same author

Assessment of the Relevant Field of View of Unipolar Electrodes Using In Vivo Imaging.

JACC. Clinical electrophysiology·2026
Same author

Influence of spatial resolution and scar extent on stretch-activated mechano-electric feedback in post-infarction ventricular models.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same author

PyMeshTool - A framework for building efficient automated image-based cardiac anatomical twinning workflows in Python.

Computer methods and programs in biomedicine·2026
Same author

Assessing the importance of sex and disease-specific anatomy in electrophysiology and mechanical simulations with a newly developed public virtual cohort of four-chamber heart models.

PLoS computational biology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 6, 2026

MRI and PET in Mouse Models of Myocardial Infarction
10:46

MRI and PET in Mouse Models of Myocardial Infarction

Published on: December 19, 2013

12.4K

Comparison of LGE MRI Scar Identification Methods for Atrial Computational Modeling.

Jake A Bergquist1,2,3, Benjamin Orkild1,2,3, Eugene Kwan2

  • 1Scientific Computing and Imaging Institute, University of Utah, SLC, UT, USA.

Computing in Cardiology
|February 5, 2026
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Personalizing cardiac models requires accurate scar identification. This study found significant differences between automated and human scar identification methods, impacting atrial fibrillation simulation outcomes.

More Related Videos

Visualizing Scar Development Using SCAD Assay - An Ex-situ Skin Scarring Assay
07:40

Visualizing Scar Development Using SCAD Assay - An Ex-situ Skin Scarring Assay

Published on: April 28, 2022

3.3K
Sterile Pericarditis in Aachener Minipigs As a Model for Atrial Myopathy and Atrial Fibrillation
08:56

Sterile Pericarditis in Aachener Minipigs As a Model for Atrial Myopathy and Atrial Fibrillation

Published on: September 24, 2021

3.1K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 6, 2026

MRI and PET in Mouse Models of Myocardial Infarction
10:46

MRI and PET in Mouse Models of Myocardial Infarction

Published on: December 19, 2013

12.4K
Visualizing Scar Development Using SCAD Assay - An Ex-situ Skin Scarring Assay
07:40

Visualizing Scar Development Using SCAD Assay - An Ex-situ Skin Scarring Assay

Published on: April 28, 2022

3.3K
Sterile Pericarditis in Aachener Minipigs As a Model for Atrial Myopathy and Atrial Fibrillation
08:56

Sterile Pericarditis in Aachener Minipigs As a Model for Atrial Myopathy and Atrial Fibrillation

Published on: September 24, 2021

3.1K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiovascular Research
  • Computational Biology
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Accurate patient-specific scar identification is crucial for personalizing cardiac computational models.
  • Late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (LGE-cMRI) is a key tool for visualizing scar tissue.
  • Current automated scar detection methods lack consensus for atrial fibrillation modeling.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare scar patterns identified by automated LGE-cMRI analysis versus human-guided identification.
  • To investigate the impact of scar pattern variability on patient-specific cardiac simulations.
  • To assess the sensitivity of atrial fibrillation arrhythmia simulations to scar input variations.

Main Methods:

  • Automated analysis of LGE-cMRI data for scar identification.
  • Human-guided identification of scar patterns from LGE-cMRI.
  • In silico simulation of atrial fibrillation using patient-specific models with different scar patterns.
  • Comparison of stable re-entrant arrhythmias induced by varying scar inputs.

Main Results:

  • Substantial disagreement observed between automated and human-guided scar pattern identification.
  • Significant sensitivity of atrial fibrillation simulation outcomes to variations in scar patterns.
  • Demonstrated variability in induced arrhythmias based on scar identification methods.

Conclusions:

  • Cardiac computational models are highly sensitive to scar input parameters.
  • Robust personalization tools are needed for accurate cardiac modeling.
  • Variability in scar identification impacts the reliability of patient-specific simulations.