Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Author Spotlight: Integrating Mechanical and Biological Analysis in Tendinopathy Research
Published on: March 1, 2024
Maximizing Benefit From Antenatal Steroid Use While Avoiding Overuse
Mark A Clapp1, Siguo Li, Alexander Melamed
1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, and the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California; and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida.
Objective:
To provide real-world data to inform benchmarking goals and practical issues that influence optimal antenatal corticosteroid timing and to examine patient factors, such as gestational age at steroid administration and presenting diagnoses, associated with steroid administration in relation to delivery.
Methods:
This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2024, at two large academic hospitals with level IV neonatal intensive care units in a single health system. The primary cohort of interest was individuals who delivered between 24 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome of interest was the timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration in relation to delivery, categorized as none, delivery between 6 hours and 7 days after the first dose of antenatal corticosteroid ("optimally timed" per the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's quality metric), and delivery less than 6 hours or more than 7 days after the first dose of antenatal corticosteroid ("suboptimally timed"). As a balancing measure to optimally timed antenatal corticosteroid administration, we also examined those who received antenatal corticosteroids before 34 weeks of gestation and delivered at term (after 37 weeks). We reported the rates of optimal timing and term delivery by their corresponding weeks of gestation and performed multivariable logistic regression modeling to understand patient factors and diagnoses associated with antenatal corticosteroid timing.
Results:
Among the 1,694 pregnant patients who delivered before 34 weeks of gestation, 961 (56.7%) had optimally timed antenatal corticosteroid administration, 162 (9.6%) received the first dose of antenatal corticosteroids less than 6 hours before delivery, 320 (18.9%) delivered more than 7 days after antenatal corticosteroid administration, and 251 (14.8%) did not receive antenatal corticosteroids. Of those who received antenatal steroids before 34 weeks of gestation, 747 of 2,879 (25.9%) delivered at term. There was little variation in optimal timing or term delivery by gestational age. Clinical factors associated with optimally timed antenatal corticosteroid administration compared with delivery more than 7 days after administration included pregnancy-related hypertensive disorder (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.88, 95% CI, 1.31-2.69), preterm labor (aOR 2.78, 95% CI, 1.32-5.81), premature rupture of membranes (1.37, 95% CI, 1.33-1.42), anxiety disorder (aOR 079, 95% CI, 0.76-0.83), multiparous with no history of preterm birth (aOR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.77-0.86), placenta previa (aOR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.68-0.84), and placenta accreta (aOR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.81-0.85).
Conclusion:
Achieving optimal timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration remains challenging. These findings underscore the need for improved prediction of preterm delivery and individualized patient assessment to ensure timely access to antenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth while reducing unnecessary exposure.
More Related Videos
11:07Biochemical Reconstitution of Steroid Receptor•Hsp90 Protein Complexes and Reactivation of Ligand Binding
Published on: September 21, 2011
05:55Author Spotlight: Developing a Rat Model for Weight-Bearing Intervention to Investigate Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head
Published on: September 27, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Benefits of Self-Esteem
Personality Disorders: Narcissistic and Avoidant
Characteristics of Narcissistic Personality Disorder
Narcissistic individuals exhibit an inflated sense of self-importance and an excessive need for admiration. They are often...
Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Primary Motives: Sleep, Sex, and Pain Avoidance
Sleep is a fundamental physiological drive that fosters a state of restfulness crucial for several bodily functions. It facilitates body restoration, the process by which the body repairs, rejuvenates, and maintains itself during sleep, including memory...
Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable...