Limb Position Sense Across Multiple Proprioceptive Tasks in Healthy Adults

To investigate and compare proprioception characteristics in healthy adults using different measurement methods.

Participants engaged in three tasks using a device developed to assess elbow joint proprioception: the ipsilateral matching task (IMT), contralateral matching task (CMT), and pointing task (PT). Each task was performed three times at different angles (30°, 50°, and 70°) in a randomised order for nine trials and tested for both the right and left arms. Activity level was measured using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form.

Twenty healthy adults (10 males, mean age: 39.80±12.19 years) were enrolled. The absolute error of the IMT was significantly lower than that of the CMT and PT (Bonferroni [Bonf.] p=0.029 and 0.016, respectively). PT showed a higher variable error than that of IMT and CMT (Bonf. p<0.001, and 0.040, respectively). There were no significant differences in errors across tasks based on sex or age. The total International Physical Activity Questionnaire- Short Form score showed statistically significant correlations with the absolute error (r=-.460, p=0.041) and constant error (r=-.469, p=0.037) of the CMT and variable error of the PT (r=-.478, p=0.033).

This study demonstrated that different proprioceptive tasks can assess the unique characteristics of proprioceptive function. The IMT produced lower error values than those of the CMT and PT, with the PT exhibiting higher variability. These differences may stem from distinct mechanisms that depend on the nature of each task and warrant further investigation.