Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Enrichment and Characterization of the Tumor Immune and Non-immune Microenvironments in Established Subcutaneous Murine Tumors
Published on: June 7, 2018
Tumor microenvironment changes after treatment with avelumab and immune-stimulating agent combinations in patients
Nejla Ozirmak Lermi1, Mohamed A Gouda1, Jibran Ahmed2
1The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center.
Background:
The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has led to a paradigm change in cancer management. Many patients may have inherent primary resistance to ICIs or develop secondary resistance after initial response. The impact of using novel therapeutic combinations of checkpoint blockade (avelumab) with immune stimulating agonists such as anti-OX40 and/or anti-4-1BB on the tumor microenvironment and modulation of the immune response is an intriguing strategy to evaluate how these agents interact and whether the hypothetical rationale for combinations can be translated into augmentation of anti-tumor immunity in solid tumors.
Methods:
We performed whole exome sequencing (WES), bulk RNAseq, multiplex immunofluorescence (mIF) and chromogenic immunohistochemistry (IHC) on tumor tissue and flow cytometry of the peripheral blood to study longitudinal changes following the combination of avelumab with utomilumab (a 4-1BB agonist) (arm A), PF-04518600 (an OX40 agonist) (arm B), utomilumab and PF-04518600 (arm C) and utomilumab and radiotherapy (arm D) in phase I/II study (NCT03217747).
Results:
We observed low tumor mutation burden (TMB < 6) (median: 1.88), alteration of RTK-RAS, TP53, PI3K and WNT pathways across the cohorts. Mutations in TP53, TTN and KRAS (mostly p.G12C, p.G12D) genes and copy number variations (CNV) were found in PIK3CA, CCNE1 and KRAS. Interferon gamma signaling pathway was enriched early on-treatment in tumors from patients with colorectal and pancreatic cancers in arm C. Patients deriving clinical benefit (CR/PR/SD ≥ 4 months) displayed higher T-cell frequencies at baseline (p = 0.0157), C1D15 (p = 0.0086), and C3D15 (p = 0.0070) than patients without clinical benefit.
Conclusions:
Our findings, though limited, highlight genomic differences between histologic subsets and outcome as well as the need for combination strategies that drive the recruitment and/or priming of anti-tumor T cells and address low immune permissive tumor states in patients with advanced solid tumors.
Clinical Trial Registration:
This clinical trial was registered on clinicaltrials.gov NCT03217747.
Related Concept Videos
The Tumor Microenvironment
Anticholinesterase Agents: Poisoning and Treatment
Irreversible agents form a strong bond with the cholinesterase enzyme, making it inactive. The breakdown of the phosphorylated enzyme is...
CNS Stimulants: Psychedelic Agents
Tumor Immunotherapy
Tumor Progression
Colon cancer is one of the best-documented examples of tumor progression. Early mutation in the APC gene in colon cells causes a small growth on the colon wall called a polyp. With time, this polyp grows into a benign, pre-cancerous tumor. Further...
What is the Immune System?

