Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Robot-assisted Total Mesorectal Excision and Lateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection for Locally Advanced Middle-low Rectal Cancer
Published on: February 12, 2022
Robotic evolution from Si to Xi in rectal cancer assessing operative performance and oncological outcomes
Wenpeng Wang1, Shan Gao2, Jinghao Huang3
1Department of Colorectal Oncology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin Key Laboratory of Digestive Cancer, Tianjin, China.
Purpose:
To compare perioperative and oncologic outcomes between robotic surgical platforms (Si vs. Xi) in rectal carcinoma.
Methods:
A retrospective cohort study of 86 robotic rectal cancer resections (Si: n = 31; Xi: n = 55) were analyzed at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital between November 2019 and June 2024.
Results:
Among 86 patients with comparable baseline clinicopathological variables (all p > 0.05), the Xi system showed superior perioperative efficiency: shorter operation (226.7 vs. 282.1 min, p = 0.010), console (p = 0.016) and docking times (p = 0.013), less blood loss (83.8 vs. 155.8 mL, p = 0.005), and a shorter postoperative stay (7.8 vs. 9.7 days, p = 0.016). On multivariable analyses, Xi remained independently associated with a shorter operative time (p = 0.002), reduced blood loss (p = 0.027), and decreased length of stay (p = 0.038). Complication rates, lymph node yield, and short-term oncologic quality indicators (distal resection margin [DRM], circumferential resection margin [CRM], mesorectal integrity) were comparable between two systems (all p > 0.05). In low rectal cancers (≤ 5 cm from the anal verge) with balanced baselines, Xi achieved a higher sphincter preservation rate (90.5% vs. 55.6%, p = 0.049). Survival trends numerically favored Xi (3-year DFS 79.8% vs. 73.0%; OS 92.0% vs. 83.0%), but differences were not significant (DFS: p = 0.54; OS: p = 0.26). On Cox regression, TNM stage independently predicted both DFS (p = 0.041) and OS (p = 0.029). However, the robotic platform (Xi vs. Si) showed no survival advantage (DFS: HR = 1.33, 95% CI 0.53-3.37, p = 0.548; OS: HR = 1.43, 95% CI 0.76-2.67, p = 0.267).
Conclusions:
Compared with Si, the Xi platform confers measurable perioperative advantages-shorter operative time, less blood loss, and reduced hospitalization-without compromising short-term oncologic quality or survival. In low rectal tumors, Xi may facilitate sphincter preservation under comparable baselines. Long-term outcomes appear driven primarily by disease stage rather than platform generation.
Related Concept Videos
Assessing Body Temperature - Rectal
Follow these steps for rectal temperature assessment:
Step 1: Perform hand hygiene and don clean gloves to prevent cross-infection.
Step 2: Position the patient in a side-lying position to better visualize the rectal...
The Evidence for Evolution
Convergent Evolution
Eukaryotic Evolution
Contrary to the endosymbiont theory, the eukaryote-first hypothesis proposes that the simpler prokaryotic and...
Synteny and Evolution
Around 80 million years ago, the human and mice lineages diverged from the common ancestor. During the course of evolution, the ancestral...
Predicting Reaction Outcomes

