Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Examining Changes in HRV and Emotion Following Artmaking with Three Different Art Materials
Published on: January 11, 2020
Art as a meaningful environment: an integrative model of aesthetic engagement and interpretation
1Department of Social Science, University of Alaska Southeast, Juneau, AK, United States.
Abstract:
This paper proposes a novel framework for aesthetic experience by conceptualizing artworks as proto-environments-structured, dynamic spaces where meaning emerges through the synthesis of perception, cognition, and embodied interaction. This reframes art from a representational object to a bounded, communicative environment that actively invites engagement. While the model is developed through visual art, it generalizes across material, temporal, and conceptual forms. The framework rests on two integrated mechanisms. First, the distal-proximal continuum of aesthetic engagement differentiates modes of structural engagement along a fluid, non-categorical spectrum: distal engagement emphasizes imaginal projection, whereas proximal engagement involves direct sensorimotor interaction. Artworks typically activate both, producing a blended structural profile. Second, the functional-to-aesthetic stance serves as the interpretive filter that directs how the structural profile is understood. Drawing from the container schema, ecological affordance theory, and the cooperative principle, the stance determines whether embodied inputs are treated primarily as objective structure (external locus) or as non-utilitarian, communicative meaning (internal locus). Once the aesthetic stance is adopted, the artwork's internal locus functions as a meaning-directed environment organized by the same fundamental dimensions as the physical world-space, time, and materiality. Aesthetic meaning emerges through the viewer's embodied negotiation of this structured environment across the distal-proximal range. This perspective reframes artworks not as static messages to decode, but as dynamic fields of engagement whose aesthetic status is determined by how the stance prioritizes embodied inputs as metaphorical content, shaping how bodies move, feel, and think within both physical and imaginal space.
More Related Videos
12:22Mindfulness in Motion MIM: An Onsite Mindfulness Based Intervention MBI for Chronically High Stress Work Environments to Increase Resiliency and Work Engagement
Published on: July 1, 2015
13:57Assessing the Multiple Dimensions of Engagement to Characterize Learning: A Neurophysiological Perspective
Published on: July 1, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Growth Models with Integration: Problem Solving
Interpreting R Charts
An R chart plots the range of subsets of measurements collected from a process. Each point on the chart represents the range—defined as the difference between the maximum and minimum...
Interpreting Run Charts
Mass Spectrum: Interpretation
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Integration by Parts: Indefinite Integrals