Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Portal Vein Injection of Colorectal Cancer Organoids to Study the Liver Metastasis Stroma
Published on: September 3, 2021
A Deep Learning Algorithm for Liver Metastasis Detection at Contrast-enhanced Abdominal CT in Patients with
Riccardo Sartoris1,2, Anita Paisant3,4, Alexandre Bône5
1Department of Radiology, Hôpital Beaujon, 100 boulevard du Général Leclerc, 92110 Clichy, France.
Abstract:
Purpose To evaluate the performance of a deep learning algorithm (DLA) for detecting liver metastases (LM) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) across diverse clinical contexts and compare its accuracy with that of radiologists. Materials and Methods This retrospective, bicentric study included patients with CRC who underwent contrast-enhanced abdominal CT between January 2019 and December 2021. The DLA accuracy was assessed at the per-nodule and per-patient levels and compared with that of a senior (R1) and an in-training (R2) radiologist blinded to each other's results. The LM detection and false detection rates and interreader agreement were determined. Results Among 181 patients with CRC (mean age, 64 years ± 13 [SD]; 102 male), 95 had LM and 86 had no LM. In the per-nodule analysis, the DLA LM detection rate was 81% (227 of 280; 95% CI: 76.1, 85.2), with no difference compared with R1 (79%; 222 of 280; 95% CI: 74.2, 83.6; P = .49) or R2 (76%; 214 of 280; 95% CI: 71.1, 81.0; P = .19). Detection rates of DLA increased with lesion size: less than 10 mm, 55% (51 of 93; 95% CI: 44.7, 64.6); 10-19 mm, 91% (96 of 106; 95% CI: 83.5, 94.8); and 20 mm or more, 99% (80 of 81; 95% CI: 93.3, 99.8). Detection of subcapsular LM was comparable across readers (DLA, 90% [113 of 125; 95% CI: 84.0, 94.4]; R1, 91% [114 of 125; 95% CI: 84.9, 95.0]; R2, 89% [111 of 125; 95% CI: 82.1, 93.2]). False detection rates were low (DLA, 22% [39 of 181; 95% CI: 16.2, 28.1]; R1, 20% [37 of 181; 95% CI: 15.2, 26.9]; R2, 26% [47 of 181; 95% CI: 20.1, 32.8]; DLA vs R1, P = .004; DLA vs R2, P = .01). DLA false positives were mainly biliary dilatations (n = 14) and diaphragmatic indentations (n = 12). Interreader agreement was moderate (κ = 0.63-0.75). Conclusion DLA performance did not differ from radiologists in detecting LM, with consistent results across lesion sizes and locations. Keywords: Imaging Modality, Abdomen, Gastrointestinal, Liver, Oncology, Comparative Studies, Segmentation, Diagnosis, Deep Learning Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2026.
More Related Videos
04:22Application of Laparoscopic Hepatectomy Combined with Intraoperative Microwave Ablation in Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis
Published on: March 3, 2023
11:43Advanced Animal Model of Colorectal Metastasis in Liver: Imaging Techniques and Properties of Metastatic Clones
Published on: November 30, 2016
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies I: CT and MRI
Description of the Procedures
Computed Tomography (CT) scan:
Computed Tomography (CT) scans use X-ray technology to generate detailed images of bones, organs, and tissues. During the scan, the patient lies on a moving table...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System VI: Calcium -Scoring CT
Metastasis
Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition
The epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition or EMT is a developmental process commonly observed in wound healing, embryogenesis, and cancer metastasis. EMT is induced by transforming growth factor-beta (TGF-β) or receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) ligands, which further...
Trial and Error and Algorithm
Abdominal Aorta
The celiac trunk, a singular artery, divides into the left gastric artery, which...