Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Assessment and Evaluation of the High Risk Neonate: The NICU Network Neurobehavioral Scale
Published on: August 25, 2014
Evaluating the Influence of a Risk Calculator on Physician Risk Perception and Decision-Making in IPMN Surveillance:
Greg D Sacks1, Ida J Korfage2, James Farrell3
1Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, NYU-Langone Health, New York, NY, USA. greg.sacks@nyulangone.org.
Risk calculators (RCs) did not significantly alter clinician decisions regarding surveillance for pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs). Clinicians’ thresholds for changing recommendations varied widely, indicating a need for further research into RC effectiveness.
Area of Science:
- Gastroenterology
- Clinical Decision Support
- Oncology
Background:
- Pancreatic intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasms (IPMNs) require surveillance to detect progression.
- Risk calculators (RCs) aim to aid clinicians in discontinuing surveillance for low-risk IPMNs.
- The impact of RCs on clinical judgment for IPMN management is not fully understood.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effect of a risk calculator on clinicians' assessment of IPMN progression risk.
- To determine if RCs influence decisions to continue surveillance for low-risk IPMNs.
- To identify the cancer risk threshold at which clinicians would alter their management recommendations.
Main Methods:
- Clinicians reviewed vignettes of low-risk IPMNs, assessing progression likelihood and surveillance recommendations.
- Participants were randomized to receive only vignettes or vignettes supplemented with data from the DART-1 Risk Calculator (RC).
- Judgments, decisions, and individual risk thresholds were compared between groups.
Main Results:
- The RC did not significantly change clinicians' perceived likelihood of IPMN progression across vignettes.
- No significant difference was observed in recommendations to continue surveillance between groups.
- Clinicians exhibited a wide range in their reported cancer risk thresholds for altering management.
Conclusions:
- The studied RC did not significantly impact clinicians' risk perception or surveillance decisions for IPMNs.
- The study was limited by a small sample size, warranting cautious interpretation.
- Significant variability exists in clinicians' risk thresholds, and further research is needed to understand why RCs may not influence decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Relative Risk
Factors Affecting the Risk of Infection
The integrity and count of the white blood cells help the body resist pathogens and fight infection. When impaired, it reduces the body's resistance to pathogens. The acidic pH levels of the gastrointestinal, genitourinary tracts, and skin...
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Subliminal Perception
Factors Affecting Perception
An illustrative example of a perceptual set is the scenario where an airline pilot told...
Perception
Bottom-up processing begins at the sensory level, where receptors detect external environmental stimuli. These could include the tactile sensation of...

