Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an ABSL-4 Laboratory: 3. Aerobiology
Published on: October 3, 2016
Safety, feasibility, and technique of stereo-electroencephalography in children younger than 3 years
Julie Uchitel1, Olubunmi A Fariyike1, Sarah J Rockwood1
11Stanford University School of Medicine.
Insights
Stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) is safe and feasible in children under 3 years old, even with thin skulls. This study demonstrates successful sEEG application in this young pediatric population for epilepsy monitoring.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Neurosurgery
- Epileptology
Background:
- Stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) is an intracranial monitoring technique increasingly used in pediatric patients.
- Traditional use of sEEG was limited to adults, but its application in very young children with drug-resistant epilepsy is growing.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the safety and feasibility of sEEG in pediatric patients younger than 3 years.
- To assess technical considerations, including electrode placement accuracy and complications, in this age group.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective review of 21 children under 3 years who underwent sEEG.
- Data collected on complications, electrode placement entry point error (EPE), and target point error (TPE).
- Skull thickness was measured at the thinnest point under electrodes.
Main Results:
- No significant sEEG-related complications were observed in 21 pediatric patients.
- Mean electrode placement errors (EPE: 1.9 mm, TPE: 2.8 mm) were within acceptable ranges.
- Successful electrode placement was achieved in skulls as thin as 1.5 mm.
Conclusions:
- sEEG is a safe and feasible option for epilepsy monitoring in children under 3 years.
- Technical adaptations allow for accurate sEEG performance in this young population.
- The study reports the youngest patient to undergo sEEG at 11 months without complications.
Objective:
Stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) is a minimally invasive technique for intracranial monitoring that was traditionally reserved for adults but is increasingly used in very young pediatric patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. The aim of this study was to evaluate its safety, feasibility, and technical considerations in pediatric patients younger than 3 years.
Methods:
The authors reviewed the records of 21 children younger than 3 years who underwent sEEG monitoring at Lucile Packard Children's Hospital between February 2013 and March 2025. Data were collected from patients' clinical records and operative reports. Skull thickness was measured at the thinnest point under electrodes. Primary outcome variables were 1) sEEG-related complications, and 2) electrode placement entry point error (EPE) and target point error (TPE).
Results:
Twenty-one patients (67% male) had a mean ± SE age at seizure onset of 0.5 ± 0.5 years (range birth-1.6 years). Patients underwent 23 sEEG surgeries at a mean age of 2.2 ± 0.1 years (range 0.9-2.7 years). The Mayfield headframe with the Infinity Support System was used in 65% of cases. Overall, a mean of 19 ± 1 (range 9-27) depth electrodes were placed per patient. In total, 443 electrodes were placed, most often in the frontal (189 electrodes, 43%) and temporal (121 electrodes, 27%) regions. A total of 440 bolts were used, and the most common sizes were 20 mm (68%) and 13 mm (18%); 3 electrodes were placed without bolts. The mean skull thickness at the thinnest point of electrode placement was 2.0 ± 0.1 mm (range 1.5-3.2 mm). For 417 electrodes available for analysis, the mean EPE was 1.9 ± 0.1 mm, and the mean TPE was 2.8 ± 0.1 mm. Aside from a CSF leak from a bolt in 1 patient, there were no complications. The most common procedures included open resection (61% of sEEG cases) and laser ablation (30%). Procedures were performed at a mean of 43 ± 11 days (range 0-150 days) after sEEG removal, with a mean patient age of 2.3 ± 0.1 years (range 1.2-2.9 years).
Conclusions:
This study supports the safety and feasibility of sEEG in children younger than 3 years, even in those with a skull thickness < 2 mm. Moreover, the authors report the youngest patient in the literature to have undergone sEEG at 11 months, without complications. The minimum skull thickness in which an electrode was successfully secured with a bolt was 1.5 mm. With appropriate technical adaptations, sEEG can be accurately performed in children younger than 3 years.
More Related Videos
11:29Measuring the Functional Abilities of Children Aged 3-6 Years Old with Observational Methods and Computer Tools
Published on: June 20, 2020
05:56Evaluation of the Feasibility, Safety, and Accuracy of an Intraoperative High-intensity Focused Ultrasound Device for Treating Liver Metastases
Published on: January 9, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Survey Safety
Household Wiring And Electrical Safety
Drug Dosing: Infants and Children
ortho–para-Directing Activators: –CH3, –OH, –⁠NH2, –OCH3
Piaget's Stage 3 of Cognitive Development
Conservation and Constancy of Quantity
A significant cognitive milestone in the...
Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: 5-HT3 Receptor Antagonists