Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

32.6K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
32.6K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

53.2K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
53.2K
Uncertainty: Overview00:59

Uncertainty: Overview

1.7K
In analytical chemistry, we often perform repetitive measurements to detect and minimize inaccuracies caused by both determinate and indeterminate errors. Despite the cares we take, the presence of random errors means that repeated measurements almost never have exactly the same magnitude. The collective difference between these measurements - observed values - and the estimated or expected value is called uncertainty. Uncertainty is conventionally written after the estimated or expected value.
1.7K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures03:34

Uncertainty in Measurement: Significant Figures

83.3K
All the digits in a measurement, including the uncertain last digit, are called significant figures or significant digits. Note that zero may be a measured value; for example, if a scale that shows weight to the nearest pound reads “140,” then the 1 (hundreds), 4 (tens), and 0 (ones) are all significant (measured) values.
83.3K
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals00:54

Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals

11.7K
The confidence interval is the range of values around the mean that contains the true mean. It is expressed as a probability percentage. The interpretation of a 95% confidence interval, for instance, is that the statistician is 95% confident that the true mean falls within the interval. The upper and lower limits of this range are known as confidence limits. The confidence limits for the true mean are estimated from the sample's mean, the standard deviation, and the statistical factor...
11.7K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error00:59

Propagation of Uncertainty from Random Error

2.0K
An experiment often consists of more than a single step. In this case, measurements at each step give rise to uncertainty. Because the measurements occur in successive steps, the uncertainty in one step necessarily contributes to that in the subsequent step. As we perform statistical analysis on these types of experiments, we must learn to account for the propagation of uncertainty from one step to the next. The propagation of uncertainty depends on the type of arithmetic operation performed on...
2.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

sEEGnal: an automated EEG preprocessing pipeline evaluated against expert-driven preprocessing.

Computers in biology and medicine·2026
Same author

BIDS-formatted resting-state and loudness dependence of auditory evoked potentials (LDAEP) EEG dataset from healthy women.

Data in brief·2026
Same author

Evaluating dementia risk prediction in mild cognitive impairment: an early health technology assessment of the AI-Mind tool.

GeroScience·2026
Same author

Developing Topics.

Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association·2025
Same author

Assessing the Robustness of Deep Learning Based Brain Age Prediction Models Across Multiple EEG Datasets.

IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering·2025
Same author

Reply: Foundation models in IVF: from speculation to implementation with FEMI.

Human reproduction (Oxford, England)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Non-restraining EEG Radiotelemetry: Epidural and Deep Intracerebral Stereotaxic EEG Electrode Placement
06:58

Non-restraining EEG Radiotelemetry: Epidural and Deep Intracerebral Stereotaxic EEG Electrode Placement

Published on: June 25, 2016

20.0K

Uncertainty in deep learning for EEG under dataset shifts.

Mats Tveter1, Thomas Tveitstøl1, Christoffer Hatlestad-Hall2

  • 1Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.

Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
|February 6, 2026
PubMed
Summary

Ensemble learning methods improve artificial intelligence (AI) diagnostic accuracy and uncertainty estimation for electroencephalography (EEG) data. These AI models reliably predict cognitive decline, even with data shifts, enhancing clinical trust.

Keywords:
AIDeep learningEEGMLShiftsUncertainty

More Related Videos

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms
10:25

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms

Published on: November 11, 2022

10.9K
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Non-restraining EEG Radiotelemetry: Epidural and Deep Intracerebral Stereotaxic EEG Electrode Placement
06:58

Non-restraining EEG Radiotelemetry: Epidural and Deep Intracerebral Stereotaxic EEG Electrode Placement

Published on: June 25, 2016

20.0K
Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms
10:25

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Cryo-Electron Tomograms

Published on: November 11, 2022

10.9K
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
08:20

Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images

Published on: October 27, 2023

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Medical Diagnostics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Integrating AI into medical diagnostics requires reliable uncertainty estimates alongside accurate predictions.
  • Understanding prediction confidence is crucial for clinical decision-making, especially in out-of-distribution scenarios.
  • Uncertainty metrics aim to align model confidence with actual performance, adapting to reliability changes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of ensemble learning strategies on performance and uncertainty estimation in EEG-based cognitive decline classification.
  • To evaluate AI models on in-distribution, out-of-distribution, and dataset-shifted EEG data.
  • To assess the reliability of uncertainty estimates under various data perturbations.

Main Methods:

  • Evaluated ensemble methods and Monte Carlo dropout on a large EEG dataset.
  • Assessed model performance and uncertainty in three settings: in-distribution, out-of-distribution generalization, and gradual dataset shifts (noise, drift, frequency perturbation).
  • Utilized deep ensembles and independently trained models for robust classification.

Main Results:

  • Ensemble methods, particularly deep ensembles, consistently outperformed other models in both in-distribution and out-of-distribution settings.
  • Ensembles provided more informative and reliable uncertainty estimates across different types of EEG dataset shifts.
  • Model diversity and independent training proved beneficial for robust, uncertainty-aware classification.

Conclusions:

  • Ensemble learning strategies enhance the reliability and accuracy of AI models for EEG-based cognitive decline detection.
  • These findings support the clinical deployment of AI by ensuring transparency and robustness under data variability.
  • Uncertainty-aware models are essential for safe and trustworthy AI applications in healthcare.