Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

Isolation and Transplantation of Hematopoietic Stem Cells HSCs
Published on: February 25, 2007
Impact of Stem Cell Mobilization with Chemotherapy Versus G-CSF Alone for Multiple Myeloma Patients with Suboptimal
Piyatida Chumnumsiriwath1, Polina Bellman2, Minh-Ha Tran3
1Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation and Cellular Therapy Program, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Orange, CA; Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Naresuan Hospital, Naresuan University, Phitsanulok Thailand.
Background:
Autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains the standard consolidation therapy for multiple myeloma (MM). Peripheral blood stem cell mobilization, performed using G-CSF alone or in combination with chemotherapy (chemo-mobilization), is a crucial step in this process. Although chemo-mobilization enhances CD34⁺ yields, its effect on disease control and post-transplant outcomes in the era of novel agents remains unclear.
Patients And Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed 67 MM patients who underwent ASCT at our institution. Thirty-two patients (47.8%) received chemo-mobilization with cyclophosphamide (37.5%) or KD-PACE plus G-CSF (62.5%) and 35 (52.2%) received G-CSF alone. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) at day 90 post-transplant, while transplant outcomes were analyzed as secondary endpoints. Propensity score-adjusted Cox models were used to assess prognostic factors.
Results:
Chemo-mobilization yielded a higher median CD34⁺ collection (7.9 × 10⁶/kg vs. 6.6 × 10⁶/kg; P = .035), fewer apheresis sessions (P = .005), and reduced plerixafor use (P = .005) compared with G-CSF alone. Among chemo-mobilized patients, 89% showed decreased tumor burden and 21% achieved improved response pre-ASCT. ORR at day 90 post-ASCT was comparable between groups (90.6% vs. 94.3%; P = .569). Complete remission (CR+sCR) and MRD negativity were higher in the G-CSF cohort (65.7% vs. 43.8%, P = .008; 90% vs. 60%, P = .007). At 20-month median follow-up, 3-year PFS was 48.4% versus 89.6% (P = .031); OS did not differ significantly (P = .230). Achieving ≥ VGPR pre-ASCT predicted improved PFS (HR 4.04, 95% CI, 1.04-15.71; P = .044).
Conclusion:
Chemo-mobilization improves stem cell yield and reduces tumor burden without added toxicity. Achieving ≥ VGPR before ASCT was associated with lower relapse risk and superior PFS.
Related Concept Videos
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Somatic...
Adult Stem Cells
Embryonic Stem Cells
Embryonic Stem Cells
ES cells are grown in a culture medium where they can divide indefinitely, creating ES cell lines. Under certain conditions, ES cells can differentiate, either spontaneously into a variety of...
Distinctive Features of Adult Stem Cells vs Cancer Stem Cells
Adult stem cells
Adult stem cells are tissue-specific; hence, they divide to develop the tissue from which they originate. One type of adult stem cell is the epithelial stem cell, which gives rise to the keratinocytes in the multiple layers of epithelial cells in the epidermis of the skin. Adult bone marrow has three distinct types of stem cells:...

