Related Experiment Video
Updated: Feb 8, 2026

The use of Biofeedback in Clinical Virtual Reality: The INTREPID Project
Published on: November 12, 2009
Artificial intelligence in virtual fracture clinics: a systematic review of imaging and clinical-text tools
Tenghis Sukhbaatar1, Andrew Davies2,3, Aran Koye4
1Imperial College London, London, UK. tenghis.sukhbaatar21@imperial.ac.uk.
Background:
Virtual fracture clinics (VFCs) are a well-established component of acute orthopedic management pathways. Artificial intelligence (AI) healthcare tools are increasingly sophisticated and have the potential to disrupt current practices. The aim of this review was to determine the opportunities, performance and readiness of AI systems that integrate clinical-text and imaging data for the triage or management of patients in VFCs.
Methods:
A search of MEDLINE and Embase was performed between January 2010 and July 2025. The review included primary research studies investigating AI for fracture detection via X-rays and natural language processing (NLP) models for clinical documentation. A random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to calculate pooled sensitivity and specificity, stratified by anatomical region and developer type (commercial vs. researcher-developed).
Results:
We included 54 studies: 52 imaging/X-ray studies and 2 NLP/clinical-text studies. Among the imaging studies, 13 evaluated commercial tools, and 39 evaluated researcher-developed models. There were 2 NLP models, both of which interpreted radiology reports rather than text summaries of clinical assessments. No studies that included the use of NLP models in acute orthopedic care could be found. A meta-analysis of commercial tools (n = 11) demonstrated a pooled sensitivity across both multiregional "Limb" tools of 92.58% (95% CI 90.61-94.17%) and anatomy-specific "Wrist" tools of 89.95% (95% CI 72.18-96.86%). Wrist-specific commercial tools demonstrated higher specificity (96.80%; 95% CI 90.12-99.01%) compared to general limb tools (89.69%; 95% CI 84.02-93.51%), suggesting that anatomical targeting may reduce the number of false positives. Researcher-developed models (n = 32) often reported superior metrics for sensitivity compared to the sensitivity of commercial tools.
Conclusions:
VFCs require the integration of information from imaging and patient records. Multiple image interpretation tools are available with high performance in fracture identification. The development and integration of NLP tools to interpret clinical documentation from emergency departments and urgent care centers are necessary for AI-VFC.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include:
Clinical Trials
There are four phases in a clinical trial. A phase one...
Clinical Trials: Overview
Changes in Skin Color: Clinical Perspectives
Albinism
Albinism is a genetic disorder that affects (completely or partially) the coloring of skin, hair, and eyes. The defect is primarily...
COPD: Pathogenesis and Clinical Features
The primary cause for the onset of COPD is cigarette smoking and exposure to air pollution. These hazardous factors initiate a chain reaction within the lungs, resulting in chronic inflammation, damage to the airways, and a...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:

