Commentary on Notification and Recordkeeping of Occupational Mesothelioma in India

Raja Singh1, Arthur L Frank1

  • 1Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, Dornsife School of Public Health, Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Insights

Occupational mesothelioma, linked to asbestos, is underreported in India. Zero cases were officially notified under mining law and only one under factory law, despite published medical literature indicating a higher incidence. Disease surveillance requires strengthening.

Area of Science:

  • Occupational Health
  • Public Health Surveillance
  • Cancer Epidemiology

Background:

  • Mesothelioma is a serious occupational cancer primarily caused by asbestos exposure.
  • India has specific laws (Mines Act, 1952; Factories Act, 1948) for notifiable occupational diseases, including mesothelioma.
  • Published medical literature indicates a significant burden of mesothelioma in India, contrasting with official notification data.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the discrepancy between reported and actual incidence of occupational mesothelioma in India.
  • To evaluate the effectiveness of current disease notification systems for occupational cancers.
  • To highlight the need for improved disease surveillance and reporting in India.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of official notification data for mesothelioma and occupational cancer under the Mines Act, 1952, and Factories Act, 1948, from 2004 to 2024.
  • Comparison of official data with published medical literature on mesothelioma cases in Indian hospitals.
  • Assessment of the coverage and scope of the National Cancer Registry Program in relation to occupational cancers.

Main Results:

  • Zero cases of mesothelioma were notified under the Mines Act, 1952, between 2004 and 2024.
  • Only one case of occupational cancer (mesothelioma category) was notified under the Factories Act, 1948, across India's states and union territories.
  • Existing cancer registries cover only 16% of the population, potentially missing occupational cases.

Conclusions:

  • Significant underreporting and lack of notification of occupational mesothelioma exist in India.
  • Current disease surveillance systems are inadequate for accurately tracking occupational cancers like mesothelioma.
  • Vigorous enhancement of national disease surveillance is crucial to reduce preventable diseases, healthcare burdens, and future medical costs.